ReTrace compiles agent SOP runs into code-selected workflows
On 79 production procedures, compiled workflows reached 93.8% completion versus 96.8% for the agent at 24% lower cost.
87 stories, newest first · one card per story
On 79 production procedures, compiled workflows reached 93.8% completion versus 96.8% for the agent at 24% lower cost.
GD-GRPO and observation-gated multi-teacher distillation beat Mix-RL and vanilla MOPD on 14 benchmarks.
A deterministic loop checks each call in a median 5.7 microseconds, and flagged calls go to a reasoning guardian.
ToolSpace raises Qwen3.6-35B-A3B from 23.0 to 41.0 average score and GLM-5.2 from 44.6 to 56.6 on seven long-horizon tool-use benchmarks.
TAC-CoT replaces explicit CoT with compact latent segments while retaining tool call tokens improving accuracy and reducing forward passes.
TAC-CoT interleaves compact latent reasoning segments with explicit tool calls, observations, and answers to enable tool-use without verbalizing every step.

Sixty-four replays of the unfinished curl command produced 52 different hosts, including nonexistent and local addresses.
Apriel Voice 27B Preview processes speech inputs and generates responses with tool calls on a shared backbone built from Gemma 4 26B-A4B.
Across 458,752 tasks and 849 models, tool and database diversity beat adding tasks as data budgets grow.

In a Cohere sandbox, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next issued a curl PUT of a fixed probe string; the request never left the system.
Harmful tool calls hit 27%–99% of cases already rated untrustworthy; a forewarning cut execution in four of five models.
The strongest evaluated model or harness reached only 42.3% success on 1,588 tasks across six ecosystem states.
Across five Qwen3 scales it lifts the equal-weight Tau1, Tau2 and BFCL mean by 16.9 to 29.8 points.
On language tasks, incorrect-target success rises 9.3 to 35.8 points versus a fixed-target baseline.
Sixteen systems score 64.32% to 83.60% strict success, with leaders diverging sharply in cost and domain reliability.
The benchmark has 300 matched unsafe/safe pairs across six domains and compares ten models.
On PolicyGym, a trained guard cut attack success 40-44% relative to prompting and rejected fewer benign requests.
A factorized training subset improved transfer to unseen white-box setups and external black-box harnesses.
On 22 benchmarks, average scores rise 9.7–12.6 points over matched no-tool baselines across eight backbones.
GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 lose 11.3 and 7.9 points via a section index, while two Claude models show no detectable drop.
End-to-end final-answer accuracy is 0.98, matching the dedicated specialist and above a 0.28 baseline.
The best of 12 frontier models scores 39.0%; humans score 21.1% across 1,000 attempts.
On FDBench v3, tool coverage rises 16 percentage points and mean final-response latency falls 36.4 percent versus a windowed baseline.
GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 lost 11.3 and 7.9 points reading reports via a section index; Claude models did not.
Today 1.5K readers · 2.4K views · 754 reads · all time 189K views