Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Linguistic Features for Interpretable Textual Entailment

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby David Torres-Moreno ()1 min read1
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

SLITE uses 17 linguistic features for textual entailment, reaching 83% on SICK and nearing RoBERTa.

The paper introduces SLITE, a hybrid explainable model for recognizing textual entailment that pairs structural-relational semantic features with distributional measures including entropy and transfer entropy. Logistic regression on 17 features reaches 83% accuracy on three-class SICK and 96% on SICK-CE, outperforming IsoLex by 4 points and landing within 2 points of RoBERTa at much lower cost. Ablation and SHAP analysis show structural-relational features drive most decisions, while distributional features help detect neutrality and contradiction.

Key facts
  • Seventeen features combine entity relations, polarity matching, and embedding alignment.
  • Logistic regression scores 83% on SICK and 96% on SICK-CE.
  • Within two points of RoBERTa at a fraction of the compute.
  • SHAP finds structural features primary and distributional features complementary.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenomena underlying their predictions.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By David Torres-Moreno · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.