Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Otherinfo

Engineer says AI agents flagged an unregistered Maya site in lidar

Original title: Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmapped Maya pyramid in 72h

Hacker News · AIby eyvindn ()6 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

INAH replied that no registered archaeological site matched the reported location; the find is not officially confirmed.

A Google software engineer says 48 AI agents reviewed public NASA lidar covering about 1,200 square kilometers and flagged a hilltop site in Mexico that he then reported to INAH. INAH replied on October 21 that its records showed no registered archaeological site at the given location. The author, who says he is not an archaeologist, interprets the shapes as a possible Classic-period Maya civic center. He sent coordinates only in a confidential annex and offered to help with an INAH-led field check.

Unconfirmed: INAH only said the location was not in its register; the site has not been confirmed by fieldwork.

Key facts
  • Agents inspected lidar images with a written guide, not a custom classifier.
  • The author says the workflow took less than 72 hours from idea to INAH’s reply.
  • Raw point-cloud slices were checked so shapes were not tree artifacts.
  • The period and function described in the post are the author’s speculation.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

6 min read at pietromiotti.com

By analyzing NASA lidar data, my AI agents discovered a Maya site in Mexico that, as far as anyone can tell, no one had reported before. It took less than 72 hours to go from a random thought while traveling to an official reply from the Mexican government. This is by far the best time ever to be alive.

Hacker News · AI

By eyvindn · pietromiotti.com

Read the full article at Hacker News · AI

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.