Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Exploit / PoChighExploited in the wild

Hackers Exploit Zyxel GS1900 Zero-Day in the Wild

Original title: Hackers Exploit Zyxel GS1900 Zero-Day in the Wild to Hijack Network Switches

Cyber Security Newsby Guru Baran ()3 min read1
Part of a story covered by 10 sourcesZyxel patches GS1900 zero-day used on 996 switchesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Patch for CVE-2026-7273 left switches vulnerable to new CVE-2026-107441 remote root command execution.

Hackers exploited a Zyxel GS1900 dispatcher.cgi flaw allowing unauthenticated root command execution. Binarly found the public exploit hit a different bug than Zyxel's initial patch. GreyNoise reported attacks on 996 switches in 48 countries, with the actor linked to the Red Heron campaign.

Unconfirmed: Whether Zyxel's first patch covered the exploited flaw or a different one.

Key facts
  • CVE-2026-107441 scored 9.8 critical by Binarly.
  • Flaw exists in global memory allowing buffer overflow.
  • 564 switches still used factory default logins.
  • Italy, United States, and Taiwan had most victims.
  • Actor stole device settings and hashed root passwords.
Security assessment · AI, from the articleExploited in the wild

Impact: unauthenticated remote code execution as root

ProductAffectedFixed in
Zyxel GS1900 switchesall ten fixed firmware releasesOctober 22 fix
What to do
  1. 1.Update to October 22 fix or newer
  2. 2.Remove web management from internet
  3. 3.Change all default passwords
Analyze CVE-2026-107441 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-107441
Out-of-bounds write in Zyxel GS1900-24E CGI up to 2.90(AAHK.2)C0
8.8—
CVE-2026-7273
Zyxel GS1900 Series Switches Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
8.83%KEVPoC
KEV

Indicators of compromise

auto-extracted · verify before use · export allAll
TypeIndicatorContext
sha2560f6e757e82c4d91df5bd249f775b9970b59dee42cc0dfe40f879d77fc16821c6cators of Compromise Malware Type SHA-256 JITTERLY Backdoor 0f6e757e82c4d91df5bd249f775b9970b59dee42cc0dfe40f879d77fc16821c6 JITTERLY Backdoor 663a8088faca8e126a11648f5671fcf4eaf96435e
sha256295133156b6a7d95b9c92f832f49e35235f1fbd3906e75c9202ef4cd65d1018c6a576eadf2c986a51f0de986d50db4e49be01bf125cb SIXZUT Rootkit 295133156b6a7d95b9c92f832f49e35235f1fbd3906e75c9202ef4cd65d1018c SIXZUT Rootkit 64677002011bc2e4bc642a4154a20fdb95620ebd0144
sha25664677002011bc2e4bc642a4154a20fdb95620ebd0144b98fc60f917901ec8b922f832f49e35235f1fbd3906e75c9202ef4cd65d1018c SIXZUT Rootkit 64677002011bc2e4bc642a4154a20fdb95620ebd0144b98fc60f917901ec8b92 SIXZUT Rootkit 728810b07e911b235f6450e784391e39f68819a0a5d2
sha256663a8088faca8e126a11648f5671fcf4eaf96435e10daf63a1d1b17d8385154cf775b9970b59dee42cc0dfe40f879d77fc16821c6 JITTERLY Backdoor 663a8088faca8e126a11648f5671fcf4eaf96435e10daf63a1d1b17d8385154c JITTERLY Backdoor 82d072ab03d90c0131b06a576eadf2c986a51f0de
sha256728810b07e911b235f6450e784391e39f68819a0a5d209662162916ffea251462a4154a20fdb95620ebd0144b98fc60f917901ec8b92 SIXZUT Rootkit 728810b07e911b235f6450e784391e39f68819a0a5d209662162916ffea25146 Give your SOC the alert context to stops incidents quickly.
sha25682d072ab03d90c0131b06a576eadf2c986a51f0de986d50db4e49be01bf125cbf5671fcf4eaf96435e10daf63a1d1b17d8385154c JITTERLY Backdoor 82d072ab03d90c0131b06a576eadf2c986a51f0de986d50db4e49be01bf125cb SIXZUT Rootkit 295133156b6a7d95b9c92f832f49e35235f1fbd3906e

From the original article

3 min read at cybersecuritynews.com

A flaw in Zyxel GS1900 switches was already being used by hackers, and the patch meant to fix it did not work. Researchers at Binarly found that a public exploit hit a different bug than the one Zyxel had patched. Zyxel has now confirmed it as a new flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-107441.

Cyber Security News

By Guru Baran · cybersecuritynews.com

Read the full article at Cyber Security News

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.