Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

FACTS-MAS weights forecasts by each evidence channel's skill

Original title: FACTS-MAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for Adaptive Forecasting from Heterogeneous Evidence

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Madumita Karthikeyan ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

On housing inventory and unemployment claims for 15 U.S. metros, it beats TimesFM, while factor-adjusted exponential smoothing matches the fused forecast.

FACTS-MAS splits heterogeneous evidence into agents for temporal dynamics, exogenous context, seasonality, structure, and discrete events. Leakage-safe historical validation scores each agent's skill against a naive reference and uses those scores to weight or drop channels. A calibration step picks domain-specific constant means from validation folds. Evaluation covers weekly Zillow for-sale housing inventory and weekly FRED unemployment-insurance claims at 4-, 8-, and 13-week horizons. The authors say the result supports the framework as a protocol for testing channels before fusing them.

Key facts
  • Uninformative evidence is removed or downweighted rather than always fused.
  • Horizons tested are 4, 8, and 13 weeks.
  • It beats a naive last-value forecast and the TimesFM foundation model.
  • Code, data, and results are linked from the paper's GitHub repository.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Real-world forecasting often requires integrating heterogeneous evidence whose predictive value varies across horizons, operating regimes, and domains. We introduce FACTS-MAS, a domain-agnostic multi-agent forecasting framework that decomposes evidence into specialized channels for temporal dynamics, exogenous context, seasonality, structural information, and discrete events.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Madumita Karthikeyan · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.