Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

LEAN regularizer reshapes weight sensitivity to cut bit-flip damage

Original title: LEAN: Loss-Engineered Modulation of the Model Weight-Sensitivity Distribution for Efficient, Error-Tolerant Neural Networks

arXiv cs.CRby Habibur Rahaman ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Ten epochs shrink the sensitive tail 5 to 13 times on nine vision models while staying within 0.5 accuracy points.

LEAN adds a composite regularizer on gradient and storage-format flip step so a trained network's weight-sensitivity distribution can be shifted. Real bit flips on the reshaped weights cause less damage, and a plain gradient-norm penalty does not reproduce the effect. With a BCH code over 1% of weights, models survive 300 progressive bit-search flips in every training seed, while three of four published defenses with the same code fail by 300. The approach also cuts parity overhead 3.7 times for a fixed guarantee.

Unconfirmed: Language-model results are described as a preliminary extension.

Key facts
  • The most sensitive 1% of weights carry about a fifth of bit-flip damage.
  • Tests cover ResNet-18, ResNet-50 and VGG-16 on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet.
  • Models survive 500 flips in two of three seeds; WCAT falls to 75% at 500.
  • ImageNet ResNet-50 stores at a 3.29-bit payload, 2.4 times smaller than INT8.
  • A preliminary extension to three small language models shows the same tail shaping.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

The weights of a trained network do not have uniform sensitivity to model accuracy: the 1% most sensitive weights carry about a fifth of the damage a bit flip can do. This distribution decides the bit-flip tolerance of a model, the fraction of weights a code must cover and the bits each weight needs; existing schemes work with the distribution training leaves.

arXiv cs.CR

By Habibur Rahaman · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.