Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Paper builds a 24-case dataset of MCP security vulnerabilities

Original title: Tracing MCP Security Vulnerabilities: Constructing and Analyzing an MCP Security Vulnerability Dataset

arXiv cs.CRby Xu He ()1 min read
Part of a story covered by 2 sourcesResearchers release dataset of 24 validated MCP vulnerabilitiesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Authors say 87.5 percent are Critical or High, and injection plus path traversal account for 66.7 percent.

The paper constructs a curated Model Context Protocol vulnerability dataset from CVE disclosures. From 119 MCP-related records retrieved through February 2026, filtering produced 24 validated vulnerabilities. The authors report recurring issues in input validation, access control, and protocol-level security, and illustrate patterns in six case studies. They release the dataset, reproducibility tooling, and a maintenance workflow.

Unconfirmed: Severity and weakness shares describe the authors' 24-case snapshot, not all MCP software.

Key facts
  • A sampled exclusion audit reached 96.7 percent inter-rater agreement.
  • Filtering kept all known high-severity MCP cases from public advisories.
  • The methodology explicitly addresses MCP acronym ambiguity.
  • The release is framed as a foundation for later measurement and defense research.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

As a core protocol for integrating large language models (LLMs) with external data sources and tools, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) has quickly become a key interface in emerging AI agent systems. As the MCP ecosystem expands, reported vulnerabilities have also increased, creating a growing software-security attack surface.

arXiv cs.CR

By Xu He · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.