Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Learning-Guided Planning in Large Dynamic Action Spaces: Budgeted Tree Search for One-to-Many Mobile Charging

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Liang-Ching Tao ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

LP-BTS uses graph proposal policies, learned critics, and budgeted PUCT search to plan mobile charging across dynamic action spaces up to 2,813 stops.

LP-BTS is a learning-guided planning architecture for one-to-many mobile charging, where N=250 sensors induce roughly 1,125 initial candidate charging stops. A graph proposal policy concentrates candidate support, a learned value critic evaluates leaves, and edge-budgeted PUCT compares simulated futures, letting a single frozen checkpoint cover action universes from 736 to 2,813 stops. On a sealed 30-scenario confirmatory bank it attains the highest observed survival (0.4545) and alive-AUC (0.8031), though its +0.0066 survival edge over the strongest engineered comparator is statistically unresolved.

Key facts
  • Handles dynamic action universes from 736 to 2,813 charging stops with one frozen checkpoint.
  • Uniform sampling costs 8.8 survival percentage points in matched ablations.
  • Sealed 30-scenario bank: highest survival (0.4545) and alive-AUC (0.8031).
  • Advantage over strongest domain-engineered comparator (+0.0066) is statistically unresolved.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Many learned sequential decision systems map the current state directly to an action. That shortcut becomes brittle when candidate actions are numerous, geometrically structured, and rebuilt with the state.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Liang-Ching Tao · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.