Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Lightweight Zero Trust via Automotive SDN

arXiv cs.CRby Friedrich Wiemer ()1 min read2 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers map automotive SDN with MACsec/MKA and CORECONF/YANG to NIST SP 800-207, satisfying five of seven Zero Trust tenets without added infrastructure.

Zonal in-vehicle networks ship Ethernet, MACsec, and TSN but treat the network itself as trusted, with no standardized runtime way to revoke access, rotate keys, or contain a compromised ECU. The paper first analyzes what Open Alliance TC17 v1.0 MACsec/MKA with pre-shared CAKs already provides against the seven NIST SP 800-207 Zero Trust tenets. It then adds CORECONF/YANG management per Open Alliance TC19, mapping the SDN Controller and Agents one-to-one onto NIST's PE, PA, and PEP, and instantiates a YANG-based network-access-control flow and key-management scheme. The result fully covers five of the seven tenets and partially covers two, without any ZTA-specific infrastructure.

Key facts
  • In-vehicle networks lack standardized runtime access revocation and compromised-ECU containment.
  • Maps SDN Controller and Agents onto NIST PE, PA, and PEP.
  • Adds YANG-based network-access-control and key-management flows via CORECONF.
  • Covers five of seven ZTA tenets fully and two partially with no new infrastructure.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Zonal in-vehicle networks ship Ethernet, MACsec, and TSN, but treat the network itself as trusted: once configured at the factory, there is no standardized runtime way to easily revoke access, rotate keys, or contain a compromised ECU.

arXiv cs.CR

By Friedrich Wiemer · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.