Cost-Aware Hierarchical Multi-Agent Ransomware Detection and Family Attribution
Researchers propose a hierarchical multi-agent system that cuts ransomware analysis cost by 44% while reaching 96.57% detection accuracy.
An arXiv paper (2609.04820) presents a Cost-Aware Hierarchical Multi-Agent System (HMAS) for adaptive ransomware detection and family attribution. Specialized agents run static analysis first, with dynamic and memory modalities invoked only when confidence is insufficient or specialists disagree; a Meta Orchestrator balances accuracy against computational cost via a cost model, and a locally deployed LLM verifies difficult cases. The system achieved 96.57% accuracy, 0.96 F1-score, and 0.99 ROC-AUC for binary detection, and 0.90 macro-F1 for multiclass family attribution. Average analysis cost dropped 43.97% versus exhaustive analysis, with 56.05% of cases resolved using static evidence alone.
- 56.05% of samples resolved with static analysis only; 4.33% required the full evidence pipeline.
- Family attribution reached 0.90 macro-F1 across ransomware families.
- Locally deployed LLM verifies hard cases without replacing the deterministic pipeline.
- Adaptive modality selection trades analysis depth for lower cost and latency.
Full article254 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
Ransomware detection and family attribution require analysis of different modalities because it can use packing, obfuscation, process manipulation and runtime evasion techniques. However, conventional multimodal usually uses all available modalities for every sample resulting in unnecessary computational cost and increased latency. In this paper, we present a Cost Aware Hierarchical Multi-Agent System (HMAS) for adaptive ransomware detection. The proposed architecture organizes specialized agents into hierarchical domain controllers coordinated by a Meta Orchestrator. Static analysis is used as the initial low-cost modality while additional dynamic and memory modality is selectively used when confidence is insufficient or specialist agents exhibit disagreement. A cost model incorporates modality use and processing overhead. It enables the orchestration policy to balance analysis performance against computational cost. A locally deployed large language model provides verification for selected difficult cases without replacing the deterministic pipeline. Experimental evaluation compares adaptive HMAS with static only, static plus dynamic and exhaustive analysis policies across binary ransomware detection and multiclass family attribution. The complete HMAS achieved 96.57% accuracy, 0.96 F1-score and 0.99 ROC-AUC for binary detection. It also achieved 0.90 macro-F1 for family attribution. At the same time, the HMAS reduced average analysis cost by 43.97% relative to exhaustive analysis and substantially reduced average analysis latency except for the case where LLM is used. Routing analysis showed that 56.05% of cases were resolved using static evidence alone. Only 4.33% required the complete evidence pipeline. These findings demonstrate that adaptive HMAS can provide accuracy cost tradeoff for ransomware analysis while retaining support for heterogeneous and incomplete modalities.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04820