Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Prompting Claude Opus 5.5

Hacker News · AIby Michelangelo11 ()14 min read7 · 4 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Anthropic published prompting guidance for Claude Opus 5.5, covering effort, agents, refusals, and visual inputs.

Anthropic's prompting guide for Claude Opus 5.5 says existing Claude Opus 5 prompts should still work, while the newer model produces output tokens more than 30 percent faster and often finishes tasks with fewer tokens. Effort defaults to medium, and Anthropic reports that medium effort matches or beats Claude Opus 5 at high effort on coding and knowledge-work evaluations. The guide covers effort calibration, always-on thinking, unattended and multiagent runs, safeguard refusals, progress updates, multi-app context, pasted text, and visual inputs. It advises setting max_tokens high enough to include thinking tokens, up to 128,000 for long agentic coding turns.

Key facts
  • Claude Opus 5.5 generates tokens over 30 percent faster than Opus 5.
  • Medium effort can match Opus 5 at high effort on coding evaluations.
  • Thinking is always on and counts toward the max_tokens limit.
  • The guide covers agents, refusals, visuals, and pasted user text.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

14 min read at platform.claude.com

Behavioral differences from Claude Opus 5 and the prompting and harness patterns that address them: effort calibration, thinking behavior in API integrations and chat, progress updates, unattended and multiagent tasks, safeguard refusals, frontend design, complex visual inputs, multi-app workflows, and pasted text in user messages. This guide covers the prompting patterns specific to Claude Opus 5. 5.

Hacker News · AI

By Michelangelo11 · platform.claude.com

Read the full article at Hacker News · AI

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.