Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Notebook counts 421,178 messages in AfD email leak

Original title: Overview of the German AfD email leak

Hacker News · securityby zinngr ()14 min read1
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The hexane archive also holds WordPress databases for afd.de and about 140 other party sites.

An analysis of the hexane archive describes two datasets: ten AfD mailboxes and WordPress databases for www.afd.de and about 140 other party websites. The notebook counts 421,178 stored messages, 49,554 threads with at least two emails, and 93,635 addresses in headers, spanning March 2013 to 14 September 2026 by send date. It says the source deduplicated by Message-ID and that mailbox-folder counts differ from header-address counts because of Bcc, lists, aliases, and mail filed under other folders. It also reports 63,718 threads citing emails missing from the archive.

Unconfirmed: Counts are the analyst's computations from the hexane archive, not an official party confirmation.

Key facts
  • Only 42 emails share a Message-ID, and 81 have none.
  • The bundesschiedsgericht folder holds 101,078 emails, but only 14% mention that address.
  • Gauland's folder stores 32,615 emails; he sent 15 of them.
  • 84% of threads are a single email; 9,111 threads span more than one mailbox folder.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: AfD mailboxes and party website databases exposed in a leak archive

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

14 min read at erik.gdn

The hexane archive contains two independent datasets from different systems. They share only the occasional email address: emails : ten mailboxes from the AfD's mail servers, and websites : the WordPress databases of www. afd.

Hacker News · security

By zinngr · erik.gdn

Read the full article at Hacker News · security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.