Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Researchmedium

Forging 1024-bit RSA signatures in nearly SNFS time

Lobsters · securityby eprint.iacr.org via dzwdz ()1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Researchers forged 1024-bit RSA signatures near SNFS speed using a signing oracle, without factoring the modulus.

An IACR ePrint paper implements the 2007 Joux–Naccache–Thomé algorithm to forge RSA signatures after temporary access to a raw signing or decryption oracle, without factoring the modulus. The authors report a 1024-bit demonstration totaling about 1380 CPU core-years, with cost close to the special number field sieve rather than the general number field sieve used for RSA key-size estimates. They argue practical signature security can be weaker than factoring-based guidance when such an oracle is available.

Key facts
  • Requires temporary access to a raw RSA signing or decryption oracle.
  • 1024-bit demonstration consumed about 1380 CPU core-years.
  • Runtime is close to SNFS, not a full GNFS factorization.
  • Argues factoring-based key-size guidance can overstate signature security.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

Alternate title: Nearly SNFS-Speed Signature Forgery Sans Factoring N (NSNFSSSFSFN) Abstract. The security of RSA is generally understood to be based on the complexity of factoring, and key size parameters are extrapolated from the general number field sieve (GNFS). However, this may not accurately represent RSA security in practical scenarios.

Lobsters · security

By eprint.iacr.org via dzwdz · eprint.iacr.org

Read the full article at Lobsters · security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.