ZeroHour
Security Affairspublished ()ingested @securityaffairs

Fortinet fixed 16 vulnerabilities, 6 rated as high severity

Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2022-26119
A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM before 6.5.0 allows a local attacker with CLI access to perform operations on the Glassfish server

A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM before 6.5.0 allows a local attacker with CLI access to perform operations on the Glassfish server directly via a hardcoded password.

NVD description · AI analysis pending
7.8<1%
  • fortinet fortisiem
CVE-2022-33870
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in the command line interpreter of FortiTester 3.0.0 through 3.9.1,

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in the command line interpreter of FortiTester 3.0.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted arguments to existing commands.

NVD description · AI analysis pending
7.8<1%
  • fortinet fortitester
CVE-2022-38374
A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiADC 7.0.0 - 7.0.2 and 6.2.0 - 6.2.4 allows an attacker t

A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiADC 7.0.0 - 7.0.2 and 6.2.0 - 6.2.4 allows an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the URL and User fields observed in the traffic and event logviews.

NVD description · AI analysis pending
6.12%
  • fortinet fortiadc
CVE-2022-40684
Admin-Interface Auth Bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy & FortiSwitchManager

Fortinet's FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager contain an authentication bypass vulnerability (CWE-288) that lets an unauthenticated remote attacker gain access to the administrative interface. It is triggered by sending specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests directly to the admin interface, with no credentials or exploit code required. By bypassing authentication, an attacker can perform administrative operations on the device, such as modifying configuration or creating privileged accounts. Any organization running the affected products is exposed, particularly where the management interface is reachable from the internet. The flaw is being actively exploited: it was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2022-10-11 with known ransomware use, and EPSS assigns it roughly a 100% probability of exploitation within 30 days, although no public PoC is known.

Do: Upgrade FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager to the fixed releases identified in Fortinet's advisory per the KEV required action. As mitigation, restrict access to the admin interface (e.g., disable WAN-facing management and use local-in policies or allow-lists for management IPs). Review admin logs and device configuration for signs of unauthorized access, such as unexpected admin accounts, added SSH keys, or config changes.

9.8100% KEV ransomware PoC ×2
  • Fortinet FortiOS
  • Fortinet FortiProxy
  • Fortinet FortiSwitchManager
massHundreds of thousands of internet-exposed Fortinet admin interfaces (~300k+ exposed FortiGate/FortiProxy management interfaces observed in public scans around…
Full article260 words · extracted from securityaffairs.com · click to collapse

Pierluigi Paganini November 03, 2022

Fortinet addressed 16 vulnerabilities in some of the company’s products, six flaws received a ‘high’ severity rate.

One of the high-severity issues is a persistent XSS, tracked as CVE-2022-38374, in Log pages of FortiADC. The root cause of the issue is an improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiADC. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can trigger the flaw to perform a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack via HTTP fields observed in the traffic and event logviews.

Another issue addressed by the company is a command injection in CLI command, tracked as CVE-2022-33870, of FortiTester.

“An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in the command line interpreter of FortiTester may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted arguments to existing commands.” reads the advisory.

Another issue, tracked as CVE-2022-26119, impacts FortiSIEM, the issue is described as “Glassfish local credentials stored in plain text.”

A local attacker with command-line access can exploit the bug to perform operations on the Glassfish server directly via a hardcoded password.

The full list of vulnerabilities addressed in November 2022 is available here.

In October, Fortinet confirmed that the critical authentication bypass issue, tracked as CVE-2022-40684, is being exploited in the wild. The issue impacted FortiGate firewalls and FortiProxy web proxies.

An attacker can exploit the vulnerability to log into vulnerable devices.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook

[adrotate banner=”9″][adrotate banner=”12″]

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Fortinet)

[adrotate banner=”5″]

[adrotate banner=”13″]



Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://securityaffairs.com/138021/security/fortinet-nov-2022-flaws.html