Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
Sen. Adam Schiff says voluntary AI pledges are insufficient and backs a dedicated regulator.
In a Decoder interview, California Senator Adam Schiff criticized a non-binding White House pledge in which AI executives agreed to evaluate their own systems. He called advanced and recursive models, Pentagon use of AI, and possible involvement in target selection national-security concerns, and said the administration pressured Anthropic after it opposed domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. Schiff supports a new agency to regulate AI and noted that the Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision, which ended Chevron deference, could tie new rules up in litigation. He also compared prospects for AI regulation with the record on social media.
- Schiff says a voluntary White House AI safety pledge is not enough.
- He supports creating a dedicated agency to regulate AI.
- Loper Bright ended Chevron deference and could stall new rules in court.
- He cites pressure on Anthropic over surveillance and autonomous-weapons limits.
- Vendors
- Anthropic
- Organizations
- White HouseU.S. SenatePentagon
- Countries
- United StatesIran
From the original article
16 min read at theverge.com
Today, I’m talking with Senator Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California. Sen. Schiff sits on a number of committees with oversight into tech and AI: intellectual property, antitrust, privacy and technology — it’s all there.
By Nilay Patel · theverge.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.