Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Otherinfo

Criminal Deception in Silicon Valley

Schneier on Securityby Bruce Schneier ()1 min read3 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Academic paper analyzing 2000-2023 Silicon Valley fraud prosecutions introduces 'facading,' a framework for how entrepreneurs project illusory growth while committing criminal deception.

A paper analyzing court data from Silicon Valley ventures and founders prosecuted for fraud between 2000 and 2023 describes entrepreneurial criminal deception as a process of 'facading,' projecting high-growth appearances while masking underperformance. It identifies three escalating forms - surface, reinforced, and deep facading - tied to the gap between audience expectations and venture reality. The authors propose deterrence measures including expanded SEC surveillance and whistleblower programs, investor due diligence reform, and entrepreneurship education interventions.

Key facts
  • Three facading forms correspond to minor, wide, and extreme expectation-reality gaps.
  • Proposes SEC surveillance extension, whistleblower program, and investor due diligence reform.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at schneier.com

Abstract: With entrepreneurial fraud cases on the rise, we investigate how entrepreneurs carry out criminal deception , employing deceptive means to defraud audiences.

Schneier on Security

By Bruce Schneier · schneier.com

Read the full article at Schneier on Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.