Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Lean Graph Search for Formal Theorem Proving

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Yihan Xu ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

LeanGraphSearch retrieves supporting Lean lemmas via dependency graphs and lifts theorem-proving pass rates.

LeanGraphSearch builds a graph of Mathlib forward dependencies in Lean 4 and propagates relevance along multi-hop premise chains before reranking candidates against the query. Versus LeanSearch v2, recall improves by up to 12% on MathlibQR and complete annotated proof-route coverage rises by up to 3.7% of groups on MathlibMPR. Inside an iterative Lean-feedback prover, pass rates at 8, 16, and 32 reflection turns rise by as much as 40% over a vanilla prover and at most 10% over LeanSearch v2.

Key facts
  • LeanGraphSearch ranks lemmas via Mathlib multi-hop dependencies.
  • Recall rises up to 12% over LeanSearch v2 on MathlibQR.
  • It covers up to 3.7% more annotated proof-route groups.
  • Pass rate improves by as much as 40% versus a vanilla prover.
  • Gains versus LeanSearch v2 reach at most 10%.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Retrieving relevant lemmas is crucial for formal theorem proving, enabling provers to build machine-checkable proofs from established mathematical results. Recent retrieval systems match library declarations to a target theorem or its intermediate proof steps, but make limited use of multi-hop dependencies among declarations.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Yihan Xu · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.