Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Cost-augmented Schrödinger bridges on graphs are exactly solvable: a Feynman-Kac tilt replaces learned control

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Akshay Balsubramani ()1 min read3
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Graph Schrödinger bridges with state costs are solved exactly via a Feynman-Kac tilt, with no learning.

The paper shows that a state cost on a generalized Schrödinger bridge over a graph folds into the reference process as a Feynman-Kac tilt, making the cost-augmented bridge an ordinary bridge against that tilted reference. It is computed exactly by alternating two sparse matrix-exponential endpoint rescalings, without time discretization or learned control. On a protein-folding model a free-energy cost lowers the expected barrier, and road-network rollouts match the target within sampling error with linear memory at millions of intersections.

Key facts
  • A state cost becomes a Feynman-Kac tilt of the reference process.
  • The bridge is computed by two sparse matrix-exponential rescalings, with nothing learned.
  • Convergence depends only on the endpoint coupling.
  • Memory grows linearly on road networks with millions of intersections.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

The generalized Schrödinger bridge on a graph moves mass between two distributions while charging a cost for the states visited. It has been approached by learning the rates of a controlled continuous-time Markov chain, with a temporal-difference penalty that restores the cost. A state cost folds into the reference process as a Feynman-Kac tilt.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Akshay Balsubramani · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.