Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Pyrite benchmarks LLM agents on protein-ligand pose ranking

Original title: Pyrite: Building and Benchmarking Protein-Ligand Pose Ranking Agents

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Megha Srivastava ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

On 1,500 pose pairs, PyriteFeaturizer reaches 74% accuracy and PyriteReasoner 67%, while expert chemists perform near chance.

Pyrite is a pairwise pose-ranking benchmark of 1,500 pose pairs across protein-ligand complexes. Expert chemists using 3D visualization and physics-based scores perform near chance. PyriteRep encodes geometry, interactions and physicochemical scores. Two LLM agents, PyriteReasoner and PyriteFeaturizer, reach up to 67% and 74% accuracy. LLM-guided feature discovery generally beats direct reasoning, and GRPO lets open-weight models match or surpass closed-source frontier models in the authors' evaluations.

Key facts
  • The benchmark has 1,500 pose pairs.
  • PyriteReasoner reaches up to 67% accuracy via text comparison.
  • PyriteFeaturizer reaches up to 74% by generating features for logistic regression.
  • GRPO improves open-weight models to match or beat closed-source models in these tests.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Predicting how a ligand binds to its target is central to small-molecule drug discovery. Modern cofolding models can generate diverse candidate poses, but reliably ranking these candidates remains challenging. We introduce Pyrite, a pairwise pose-ranking benchmark comprising 1,500 pose pairs across diverse protein-ligand complexes.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Megha Srivastava · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.