ZeroHour
Help Net Securitypublished ()ingested @zeljkazorz

Attackers plant remote access tools on compromised PaperCut servers

highExploit / PoC exploited in the wildimportance 78CVE-2026-81578CVE-2026-82078
AI summary · glm-5.3-flash

Attackers chained two PaperCut NG/MF zero-days for unauthenticated access, installing SimpleHelp and AnyDesk remote access tools on compromised servers.

An ongoing campaign exploits chained zero-days CVE-2026-81578 (improper access control) and CVE-2026-82078 (unsafe dynamic class loading) in internet-facing PaperCut NG and MF Application Servers, enabling authentication bypass and arbitrary Java bytecode execution. Post-compromise activity includes user and domain enumeration, payload download from sendit.sh, and silent installation of SimpleHelp and AnyDesk for redundant remote access; Defused observed CVE-2026-81578/CVE-2026-82078 exploit activity in honeypots since August 29, including data theft via Derby database dumps. Emergency patches were released August 28 and August 30, but 47% of roughly 2,500 PaperCut installs tracked by Huntress run v23 or older, for which no patch is available.

  • Two chained zero-days: CVE-2026-81578 (access control) and CVE-2026-82078 (class loading)
  • Attackers install SimpleHelp and AnyDesk as redundant remote access channels
  • Second emergency patch round extends fixes to the v24 branch; v23 and older still unpatched
  • Huntress confirmed exploitation in two customer environments; watchTowr found patch bypasses
  • Vendor recommends restricting web access, applying patches, and rebuilding compromised Application Servers

Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2026-82078
+1 in the same advisory: …81578
Unsafe Reflection RCE in PaperCut NG/MF, Chained with Auth Bypass in Attacks

CVE-2026-82078 is an unsafe dynamic class loading flaw (unsafe reflection, CWE-470) in the database connection utilities of PaperCut NG and PaperCut MF: the software instantiates a database driver class based on a configurable driver name without validating it against an allowlist of approved drivers. An attacker who can manipulate system configuration parameters can point that setting at classes of their choosing, causing the server to execute arbitrary Java bytecode residing on the application classpath in the security context of the PaperCut server process. On its own the issue is rated 9.4 (Critical) with high privileges required, but when chained with the companion authentication bypass CVE-2026-81578 it yields unauthenticated remote code execution on the print-management server. All PaperCut NG and MF deployments are in scope; affected version ranges were not specified in the available data, so administrators should consult PaperCut's advisory for fixed versions. The flaw is confirmed exploited in the wild as a zero-day: it was added to CISA's KEV catalog on 2026-08-31, and public reporting describes an AI-orchestrated campaign that compromised PaperCut servers at roughly 395 organizations (~440 servers), with EPSS currently at 1.7% (76th percentile).

Do: Upgrade PaperCut NG and MF to the patched release specified in PaperCut's security advisory (exact fixed versions were not provided in this data), prioritizing internet-exposed print servers; the KEV listing means agencies must remediate per CISA BOD 26-04 or discontinue/mitigate per its cloud-service guidance. Restrict the PaperCut web interface from direct internet exposure (VPN/allowlist), review administrator accounts and database driver configuration for tampering, and hunt for post-exploitation activity, since this flaw is being actively chained with the authentication bypass CVE-2026-81578.

9.4
group max
2% KEV
  • PaperCut NG
  • PaperCut MF
mass≈100,000+ organizations / plausibly millions of end users (vendor-cited install base); tens of thousands of on-prem servers with a smaller but significant…
Full article1,010 words · extracted from helpnetsecurity.com · click to collapse

The threat actor targeting internet-facing PaperCut Application Servers is covertly installing legitimate remote access software on them, PaperCut Software shared in the most recent update on the ongoing attack campaign.

OPIS

PaperCut zero-days exploited to deploy remote access tools

The vendor first warned of in-the-wild compromises on August 27, 2026, when it urged customers using the PaperCut NG and MF print management solutions to “immediately restrict web access to trusted IP addresses only.”

At the time, PaperCut believed the threat actor exploited a previously unknown vulnerability to gain access and control over the solutions’ Application Server, but their investigation later revealed they leveraged two zero-day vulnerabilities:

  • CVE-2026-81578, an improper access control vulnerability in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG
  • CVE-2026-82078, an unsafe dynamic class loading vulnerability in the database connection utilities of the two solutions

Chained together, the two flaws allowed the unauthenticated threat actor to bypass authentication, modify certain system configurations, and execute arbitrary Java bytecode under the security context of the PaperCut server process.

With the help of a university customer’s security and digital forensics and incident response teams, PaperCut Software reproduced the vulnerabilities, and pushed out emergency patches on August 28.

Later that same day, the vendor published a second round of emergency patches (with “additional hardening developed with internal security and external researchers”) and urged customers to apply them even if they had already applied the initial ones.

On August 30, they followed up by extending the initial list of provided indicators of compromise and shared a command sequence that shows what the attackers are doing after gaining access to the Application Servers:

  • They list users and their privileges and running processes
  • Enumerate domain controllers in the domain
  • List logged-on user sessions
  • Download a malicious payload from a file-sharing host (sendit.sh) into C:\ProgramData
  • Silently install and run the payload, which installs SimpleHelp remote access software and sets it up to auto-start, and checks that it’s running
  • Download AnyDesk to establish a second, redundant remote access channel

“As every customer environment is unique, it is difficult to identify a single consistent pattern of post-compromise activity, but observed behaviour includes the pc-app.exe (or pc-app) process launching child shell processes (cmd.exe) and running whoami & ver, with endpoint protection in some cases preventing further execution and isolating the machine,” PaperCut noted.

In cases where execution was not prevented, the attackers performed the above listed actions that ended with AnyDesk being installed.

Since PaperCut’s initial disclosure, Rapid7 published a technical overview of the vulnerabilities, watchTowr researchers discovered multiple patch bypasses and identified an additional authentication bypass vulnerability, which they reported to PaperCut.

Huntress analysts found evidence of exploitation in two customer environments, but the exploitation activity was limited. In one of the cases, the exploited instance was running PaperCut MF version 24.1.5.71847.

What should customers do?

The initial round of emergency patches for PaperCut NG and MF were made available only for the v25 and v26 branches, but the second one includes patches for the v24 branch.

Huntress researchers noted that “47% of the approximately 2,500 PaperCut installations Huntress tracks are running v23 or older, for which no patch is currently available.”

PaperCut advises customers running PaperCut NG/MF versions older than v24 to upgrade to the latest version.

“Site Servers and secondary/print servers should be updated to a patched version, not just the primary Application Server. Other components such as Print Deploy and Mobility Print are not affected and do not need to be updated,” the vendor added.

Huntress advises users to:

  • Preserve forensic evidence before updating
  • Implement the provided emergency updates and restrict web access to PaperCut Application Server to trusted IP addresses
  • Review the preserved logs for known indicators of compromise

“We recommend checking for the presence of a Windows service named ‘Remote Access Service’ running SimpleService.exe from the [C:\ProgramData\JWrapper-Remote Access\JWAppsSharedConfig\restricted\ path], and for unexpected AnyDesk installations, as potential indicators of post-compromise remote access tooling,” PaperCut advised.

But, they also pointed out that the absence of already shared indicators of compromise doesn’t mean a system has not been affected. “PaperCut will publish validated, specific indicators and further guidance here as soon as they are available,” they added.

“If you suspect your server has been compromised, we recommend securing current server backups, completely wiping and rebuilding the Application Server, and restoring a clean backup taken before any suspicious behavior was detected. Additionally, you should activate your organization’s security response procedures and follow standard incident protocols.”

The attackers’ ultimate goal remains unknown.

Three years ago, Clop and LockBit affiliates exploited two known PaperCut vulnerabilities to compromise servers and deploy ransomware. This time the flaws were zero-days rather than known bugs, but today’s attackers have an additional edge: AI tools that can help them analyze target software, surface previously unknown vulnerabilities, and write working exploits.

UPDATE (September 2, 2026, 04:10 a.m. ET):

Threat intelligence firm Defused says it has seen CVE-2026-81578 / CVE-2026-82078 exploit activity in their honeypots since late August 29.

“An actor is abusing the auth bypass to hijack PaperCut’s external user-lookup. Unlike the RCE path in public writeups, the actor goes for data theft – dumping DB tables via Derby,” they noted. “We haven’t yet verified whether the exfil route is a working one.”

PaperCut released a third round of emergency patches that supersede the previous two (and can be installed without installing the previous two first).

“This release addresses two known regressions and adds additional hardening and mitigation against potential attack chains,” the company said in an update of the original security advisory.

PaperCut CEO Chris Dance also penned a post on what happened behind the scenes since they first found out about the in-the-wild exploitation.

Having learned from past experience – i.e., the 2023 ransomware attacks when multiple groups ended up leveraging the same vulnerability exploit soon after the initial attack – he refrained from sharing technical details about the exploit chain for now.

Subscribe to our breaking news e-mail alert to never miss out on the latest breaches, vulnerabilities and cybersecurity threats. Subscribe here!

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/08/31/papercut-attack-remote-access-tools/