Observational Indistinguishability and Integrity Blind Regions in Hybrid Quantum-Classical Workflows
Framework formalizes integrity blind regions in hybrid quantum-classical workflows, validated across 3,600 label interventions with conformal detection rules.
The paper presents a claim-relative evidence and reference framework for integrity of hybrid quantum-classical workflows, distinguishing structural blind regions caused by observational indistinguishability from finite-batch statistical misses. Experiments over 3,600 label interventions show exact label-path invariance for feature and prediction views. The geometry-aligned construction detects 343 of 2,700 conclusion-changing interventions using the conformal rule and 1,183 of 2,700 with the uncorrected union, with executed conformal clean false-action rates of 0.048-0.059.
- Defines integrity blind regions from observational indistinguishability in quantum-classical workflows
- Trusted same-batch scalar guarantees conclusion integrity within the declared lattice
- 3,600 label interventions quantify detection of conclusion-changing manipulations
- Conformal rule detects 343/2,700 interventions at 0.048-0.059 false-action rate
From the original article
1 min read at arxiv.orgWe present a claim-relative evidence/reference framework for hybrid quantum-classical workflow integrity. Observational indistinguishability yields structural blind regions, distinct from finite-batch statistical misses. Within the declared lattice, a trusted same-batch scalar $R_0$ suffices for conclusion integrity, aggregate $M_0$ for aggregate plus conclusion integrity, and item-aligned binding for item identity.
By Roberto Fernández-Barrios · arxiv.org
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.