Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

UK proposes up to 14 years in prison for damaging subsea cables

Original title: UK threatens subsea cable saboteurs with 14 years behind bars

The Register · Securityby Carly Page ()3 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A 12-week consultation would replace 1885 penalties and add security duties for telecoms operators; the plans are not law yet.

The UK government set out plans to replace parts of the Submarine Telegraph Act 1885 with tougher penalties for damaging subsea cables and pipelines. Intentional damage to critical energy or telecoms infrastructure could bring up to 14 years in prison, with unlimited fines proposed for reckless or negligent damage. Ministers also want security duties for subsea telecoms operators, powers to direct companies and repair providers, and regulation of fiber-optic sensing. Whitehall cites suspicious Russian activity, including an April submarine operation near undersea infrastructure. A 12-week consultation is open.

Unconfirmed: The measures are consultation proposals, not enacted law, and proving who damaged a cable remains difficult.

Key facts
  • Whitehall says subsea cables carry about 99 percent of UK international data traffic.
  • Underwater pipelines account for 74 percent of UK gas supply, according to the government.
  • The 1885 Act’s maximum fine for culpable negligence was £100.
  • Earlier government estimates attributed up to 97 percent of cable faults to fishing and dragging anchors.
  • Ministers would be able to direct operators where necessary and proportionate for national security.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at theregister.com

Whitehall wants tougher penalties and new powers over telecoms operators as Russian activity raises alarm

The Register · Security

By Carly Page · theregister.com

Read the full article at The Register · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.