CISA Warns Fortinet Customers as FortiBleed Hits 86,644 FortiGate Devices
Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →
| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Flags | Affected | Exposure | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-59718 | Critical FortiCloud SSO Authentication Bypass in Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy CVE-2025-59718 is a critical (CVSS 9.8) improper verification of cryptographic signature flaw (CWE-347) in the FortiCloud SSO login flow of Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager, with the Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 appliance also listed in the CVE's affected CPE entries. An unauthenticated attacker who can reach a device's FortiCloud SSO login can submit a crafted SAML response message whose cryptographic signature is not properly verified, bypassing authentication entirely. The bypass grants unauthorized access to the affected device with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, typically administrative control of the management interface. Any organization running the affected FortiOS 7.0–7.6, FortiProxy 7.0–7.6, or FortiSwitchManager 7.0–7.2 versions that uses FortiCloud SSO for administrative login is exposed. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: the flaw was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2025-12-16, security reporting describes active attacks against FortiGate firewalls via this SAML SSO bypass, and EPSS assigns a 68.3% probability of exploitation within 30 days. Do: Upgrade all affected products out of the vulnerable ranges — FortiOS beyond 7.6.3/7.4.8/7.2.11/7.0.17, FortiProxy beyond 7.6.3/7.4.10/7.2.14/7.0.21, and FortiSwitchManager beyond 7.2.6/7.0.5 — using the fixed builds listed in Fortinet's security advisory, and patch Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 firmware per Siemens guidance. As interim mitigation, disable or restrict FortiCloud SSO-based administrative login, limit management-interface exposure to trusted networks, and review admin/SSO logs for anomalous sign-ins or forged SAML responses. Given the KEV listing, US federal agencies must apply vendor mitigations or discontinue use of affected products per BOD 22-01. | 9.8 | 68% | KEV |
| masslikely on the order of 100,000+ internet-exposed FortiOS/FortiProxy systems (Fortinet's deployed base is in the millions); the directly exploitable set is the… | |
| CVE-2025-59719 | Unauthenticated SAML Signature Bypass in Fortinet FortiWeb (FortiCloud SSO) FortiWeb contains an improper verification of cryptographic signature (CWE-347) in its FortiCloud SSO login flow, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication by submitting a crafted SAML response whose signature is not properly validated. Because this requires no privileges or user interaction and is network-reachable, successful exploitation grants the attacker the access of a legitimate SSO-authenticated administrator to the appliance's management interface. The flaw affects FortiWeb 8.0.0, 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, and 7.4.0 through 7.4.9. Organizations running these versions are affected, particularly where the management interface is reachable and FortiCloud SSO login is enabled. As of this analysis the flaw is not in the CISA KEV catalog and no public proof-of-concept is known, but a closely related SAML SSO authentication bypass in FortiGate firewalls (CVE-2025-59718) is under active attack and Fortinet has issued urgent authentication patches, so elevated exploitation risk is plausible. Do: Upgrade FortiWeb to a patched release per Fortinet's PSIRT advisory covering CVE-2025-59719, prioritizing internet-facing appliances on 8.0.0, 7.6.x, or 7.4.x. As interim mitigation, restrict access to the management interface, disable or limit FortiCloud SSO login in favor of local or hardened admin authentication, and review SSO login logs for successful authentications from unexpected sources. Note that the sibling FortiGate SAML bypass (CVE-2025-59718) is being actively exploited, so treat this patch as urgent. | 9.8 | 29% |
| largetens of thousands of internet-exposed FortiWeb appliances (order of magnitude ~10k-100k), with the exploitable subset limited to deployments using FortiCloud… | ||
| CVE-2026-24858 | FortiCloud SSO Authentication Bypass Across Multiple Fortinet Products CVE-2026-24858 is an authentication bypass (CWE-288) in FortiCloud single sign-on that lets an attacker who owns a FortiCloud account with any registered device log in to other customers' Fortinet devices that have FortiCloud SSO authentication enabled. It affects a wide range of 7.x/8.x builds of FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiWeb, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiNAC-F, and the Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE 1808. An attacker gains unauthorized access to devices registered to other accounts, and related reporting describes FortiGate devices being exploited to breach networks and steal service account credentials. Any organization running an affected build with FortiCloud SSO enabled is exposed. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: CISA added the flaw to the KEV catalog on 2026-01-27 and Fortinet patched it after active FortiOS SSO exploitation was detected, and EPSS assigns an 86.1% probability of exploitation within 30 days. Do: Upgrade all affected Fortinet products to the fixed releases specified in Fortinet's PSIRT advisory for CVE-2026-24858; as an interim mitigation, disable FortiCloud SSO authentication on affected devices and audit which devices are registered to your FortiCloud account. Review device logs for unexpected administrative logins or signs of service-account credential theft on FortiGate, and federal agencies must apply mitigations per BOD 22-01 (including CISA's cloud services guidance) or discontinue use of the product. | 9.8 | 86% | KEV |
| masshundreds of thousands of devices potentially affected (Fortinet's FortiGate install base is in the millions and public internet scans have long shown hundreds… |
Full article904 words · extracted from thehackernews.com · click to collapse
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Thursday urged Fortinet customers with FortiGate appliances to take steps to secure against ongoing malicious activity aimed at thousands of internet-accessible devices.
The sweeping campaign, believed to be the work of Russian-speaking threat actors, has been codenamed FortiBleed. The number of compromised devices stands at 86,644 as of June 19, 2026.
According to data from SOCRadar, generic admin accounts (35%) and built-in Fortinet system accounts (28.3%) together make up the majority of compromised credentials. Organization-specific accounts account for 36.7% of the remaining breached credentials.
"This points directly to a widespread failure to rename default accounts or rotate factory credentials, giving the attacker a highly reliable target list before any brute force was even needed," SOCRadar said.
"Org-specific accounts topping the list is significant. It means the attacker is not just harvesting default credentials but has also successfully compromised accounts created by the organizations themselves, possibly sourced from prior breaches where passwords were never changed."
Telecom, government, and education have emerged as the top three impacted sectors, with the most exposures located in India, the U.S., Mexico, Colombia, and Thailand.
The threat actor is said to have mass-scanned the internet for Fortinet remote login endpoints, and then employed a bespoke tool to spray those identified endpoints with known login and password combinations in an attempt to break into them.
The fully-automated attack is built around a self-sustaining, two-step approach -
- The threat actor attempts a curated list of leaked Fortinet passwords against devices across the internet.
- Once access is obtained, they passively monitor network traffic going through the devices to collect additional credentials, which are then used to compromise more appliances.
The credentials are legitimate and valid, with the attackers verifying each of them before they are added to a database of confirmed, working logins.
"The scale of this breach touches nearly every sector of the global economy, sparing no industry," Hudson Rock said. "The threat actors have built a verified database of working credentials for some of the largest enterprises on the planet."
The U.K. National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has described FortiBleed as a global campaign targeting internet-facing Fortinet firewalls and VPN gateways using methods like brute-force, dictionary attack, and credential stuffing.
It's suspected that the threat actors likely exploited older credential hashing mechanisms and the way credentials have historically been stored within FortiGate configuration files to pull off the large-scale attack.
"Fortinet introduced PBKDF2-based password hashing for administrator credentials in FortiOS 7.2.11, 7.4.8, and 7.6.1, replacing the legacy SHA-256-based storage mechanism," Arctic Wolf said. "However, when upgrading from earlier versions, existing administrator passwords remain stored as SHA-256 hashes until the corresponding administrator successfully logs in following the upgrade."
"As a result, many organizations likely continue to store administrator credentials using older SHA-256 with Salt hashing mechanisms."
In a statement shared with The Hacker News, a Fortinet spokesperson said "the data involved is likely a resharing of data from previous incidents, as well as brute-forcing of credentials, and not related to any current incident or advisory," urging organizations to follow best practices, including regularly rotating security credentials and enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA).
CISA has outlined the following recommendations to defend against the activity -
- Terminate all active SSL VPN and administrative sessions, reset all Fortinet VPN and administrative passwords, especially on internet-facing systems, and enforce strong password policies.
- Ensure use of the Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2 (PBKDF2) algorithm to store administrator credentials and remove weaker legacy hashes.
- Review firewall, VPN, authentication, and domain controller logs for signs of suspicious actions, including unauthorized configuration changes.
- Enable phishing-resistant MFA on all external gateways and administrative interfaces.
- Reduce the attack surface and lock down management.
The FortiBleed incident first came to light last week after security researcher Volodymyr "Bob" Diachenko discovered a server containing the database of working login credentials for thousands of firewalls and VPN gateways across 194 countries. Per SOCRadar, the server also staged the attacker's tools and automation scripts.
The findings once again demonstrate how credential reuse and poor password hygiene can be weaponized by malicious actors, not to mention that perimeter security appliances remain a lucrative target for gaining initial access to enterprise environments.
Update
In a post shared on June 19, 2026, Fortinet said the FortiBleed campaign likely involves the threat actors reusing credentials from previous incidents, such as CVE-2026-24858, CVE-2025-59718, and CVE-2025-59719, along with employing brute-force techniques against devices with weak password hygiene and no multi-factor authentication (MFA).
To defend against the malicious activity, the company has outlined the following recommendations -
- Terminate all admin and VPN sessions and reset credentials.
- Implement MFA.
- Upgrade to the latest versions of 7.4, 7.6, or 8.0.
- Review firewall and VPN users and other configurations for unauthorized changes.
- Audit logs for unexpected administrator access from an unknown IP address, as well as for lateral movement, unusual access, suspicious accounts, or unauthorized configuration changes.
- Restrict external management via trusted hosts (good), a local-in policy (better), or remove internet administration altogether (best).
"If AD/LDAP integration is configured, it is important to treat this account as compromised and monitor your AD for its use for authentication elsewhere or the creation of additional accounts and monitor your network for lateral movement," Carl Windsor, chief information security officer (CISO) at Fortinet, said.
Found this article interesting? Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://thehackernews.com/2026/06/cisa-warns-fortinet-customers-as.html