Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Phishing & fraudhighExploited in the wild

Microsoft disrupts EvilTokens phishing service that gave criminals access to 12,000 inboxes

Help Net Securityby Sinisa Markovic ()2 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Microsoft and partners seized EvilTokens infrastructure after the phishing service compromised over 12,000 inboxes.

Microsoft, with court authorization and partners including Health-ISAC, Cloudflare, Coinbase, and OpenAI, disrupted the EvilTokens phishing service, which compromised more than 12,000 inboxes at over 10,000 organizations. Victims entered an authentication code on Microsoft's legitimate sign-in page, granting persistent token access that could survive a password reset. The service's AI tools summarized and translated mail, identified payment contacts, and drafted impersonation messages. It sold on Telegram for a $1,500 fee plus $500 recurring. On September 11, 2026, London police arrested two men, and Microsoft seized 50 sites and disabled more than 150 domains.

Key facts
  • EvilTokens compromised more than 12,000 inboxes at over 10,000 organizations.
  • Victims entered codes on Microsoft's real sign-in page, exposing tokens without passwords.
  • An AI chatbot summarized mail, mapped roles, and drafted impersonation messages.
  • Partners seized 50 websites and disabled more than 150 related domains.
  • UK police arrested two men, ages 32 and 38, who were later bailed.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

The EvilTokens phishing service, which compromised more than 12,000 inboxes at over 10,000 organizations, has been disrupted by a coalition of law enforcement and private-sector partners led by Microsoft.

Help Net Security

By Sinisa Markovic · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.