Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Threat actorhighExploited in the wild

Criminals use stolen AI access to rack up $1 million cloud bills

Original title: Stolen AI access leaves companies with cloud bills of up to $1 million

Help Net Securityby Sinisa Markovic ()3 min read1
Part of a story covered by 9 sourcesMandiant Documents LLMJacking Attacks Racking Up $1M in Cloud ChargesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

GTIG and Mandiant report LLMJacking attacks causing bills up to $1 million via stolen cloud credentials.

Criminals break into corporate cloud accounts to run AI models and generate fraudulent bills. Attacks hit sectors in North America, South America and Asia Pacific. Attackers use services like Jet Night and newapi.pro to resell stolen LLM access.

Key facts
  • Bills reached up to $1 million in some cases
  • One group made 500000 calls in under 8 hours
  • Used stolen API keys and GitHub tokens
  • Attackers turned on AI services to avoid detection
Security assessment · AI, from the articleExploited in the wild

Impact: fraudulent cloud charges from running AI models at victim expense

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-40217
LiteLLM through 2026-04-08 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via bytecode rewriting at the /guardrails/test_custom_code URI
8.816%PoC

From the original article

3 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

Criminals who break into corporate cloud accounts are using the stolen access to run AI models at the victim’s expense, in some cases racking up more than $100,000 in charges in a single day, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) and Mandiant researchers have found.

Help Net Security

By Sinisa Markovic · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.