Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

eMudhra exits global TLS business after weak certificate keys

Original title: Disgraced eMudhra drops out of TLS business following certificate debacle

Ars Technica · Securityby Dan Goodin ()1 min read1 · 1 read
Part of a story covered by 2 sourceseMudhra to exit global TLS after weak intermediate keysMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Eight intermediates used 3- to 8-bit private keys that could be cracked in milliseconds to mint trusted certificates.

India-based eMudhra Limited said it will withdraw from global SSL/TLS after researchers found eight intermediate certificates with defective private keys. Chairman V. Srinivasan cited compliance costs, revenue of 1 percent, and free certificate providers. The company said social-media scrutiny was out of proportion to that business. NIST P-384 keys should hold about 384 bits of entropy; these ranged from 3 to 8 bits.

Unconfirmed: The company did not say whether anyone used the weak keys to issue fraudulent certificates.

Key facts
  • The eight private keys were 4, 56, 66, 115, 155, 156, 230 and 237.
  • The strongest defective key had at most 256 possibilities.
  • The Thursday announcement came two days after the research disclosure.
  • Forged certificates could be trusted by major browsers and many mail servers.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: forge trusted TLS certificates for websites or mail servers

ProductAffected
eMudhra TLS intermediate certificateseight intermediates with 3- to 8-bit keys
What to do
  1. 1.Treat the eight defective eMudhra intermediates as untrustworthy for TLS.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arstechnica.com

Flubbed key signing "ceremony" allowed minting of Web credentials for any site.

Ars Technica · Security

By Dan Goodin · arstechnica.com

Read the full article at Ars Technica · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.