Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Advisorymedium

Rockwell Automation 1756-ENBT Module

CISA Advisoriesby CISA ()2 min read2
Part of a story covered by 3 sourcesCISA advisories cover four Rockwell Automation vulnerabilities across 1756-ENBT, ControlFLASH, and ArmorStart LTMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Rockwell's 1756-ENBT ControlLogix EtherNet/IP bridge (all versions) is vulnerable to DoS via crafted CIP packets, crashing the module until manual restart.

CISA republished Rockwell Automation's advisory for CVE-2025-10478, a CWE-754 flaw affecting all versions of the 1756-ENBT ControlLogix EtherNet/IP bridge, scored CVSS 7.5. A crafted CIP packet can crash the module, and the device requires a restart to recover. Affected critical infrastructure sectors include critical manufacturing, food and agriculture, transportation systems, and water. No public exploitation has been reported; CISA recommends minimizing network exposure.

Key facts
  • CVE-2025-10478 (CVSS 7.5) is a DoS flaw in the 1756-ENBT EtherNet/IP bridge
  • A crafted CIP packet crashes the module; manual restart required for recovery
  • All module versions are affected; no public exploitation reported
  • CISA recommends limiting network exposure and placing devices behind firewalls
Analyze CVE-2025-10478 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2025-10478
———

From the original article

2 min read at cisa.gov

View CSAF Summary Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could crash the module. The device requires a restart to recover. The following versions of Rockwell Automation 1756-ENBT Module are affected: 1756-ENBT module vers:all/* (CVE-2025-10478) CVSS Vendor Equipment Vulnerabilities v3 7.

CISA Advisories

By CISA · cisa.gov

Read the full article at CISA Advisories

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.