Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

SCS finds 627 malicious agent skills in 66,157 ClawHub packages

Original title: From Instructions to Exploits: Applying Program Analysis to Malicious Agent Skills Across Natural Language and Code

arXiv cs.CRby Shiwu Zhao ()1 min read1
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

On a balanced 234-skill benchmark it reached 85.6% accuracy, 95.2% recall and 86.9% F1.

Researchers present SCS, a static scanner that compiles agent-skill instructions into a constrained intermediate representation and links them with bundled code in a cross-domain dependence graph. A trust-sensitivity-capability model then flags risk. Scanning ClawHub produced 2,473 candidates, and auxiliary dynamic checks plus manual review confirmed 627 as malicious.

Key facts
  • The labeled benchmark contains 117 malicious and 117 benign skills.
  • Average precision was 80.2% across five LLMs.
  • Average token consumption was 13.7 million.
  • The instruction compiler was 92.5% to 94.5% correct on 400 annotated steps.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: malicious third-party skills can ship harmful instructions and code

Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

LLM-powered agents increasingly rely on third-party skills that combine natural-language instructions with executable code, creating supply-chain risks that may span both artifacts. Existing skill scanners often rely on rule matching or direct LLM judgments and provide limited support for tracing such cross-domain behavior.

arXiv cs.CR

By Shiwu Zhao · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.