Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Embodied Turing Machines: Stateful Code for Robot Recursive Self-Improvement

Hugging Face daily papersby Kairui Hu, Siyuan Hu, Fangzhou Hong ()1 min read4 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Code-Only-as-Policy makes robot decisions in code, reaching 70.24% success on 42 RoboDojo tasks.

The paper frames robots as Embodied Turing Machines and proposes Code-Only-as-Policy (COAP), where code tracks robot, environment, and task state from camera images and proprioception and makes every decision. The same library is reused across episodes and tasks without a VLM or VLA in the loop. On RoboDojo's 42 bimanual tasks the library reaches 70.24% success with no model at test time, and the authors position it as a medium for recursive self-improvement and as a data engine for VLAs.

Key facts
  • COAP tracks robot, environment, and task state in code.
  • No VLM or VLA runs in the control loop at test time.
  • Shared library hits 70.24% success on 42 RoboDojo bimanual tasks.
  • Coding agents can extend the library for recursive self-improvement.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Most robot policies keep a model in the control loop: a VLA maps observations to actions, and an Agent Harness, such as Agent-as-Policy or Harness VLA queries a VLM for decision making at run time. We propose a different view: the embodied world is an Embodied Turing Machine, whose tape is the robot and environment state and rules are the policy.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Kairui Hu, Siyuan Hu, Fangzhou Hong · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.