Search: “preference-optimization”

Smart search ranks by meaning as well as keywords (one row per story, last 45 days).

PLC-DPO: Posterior Label Correction in Noisy and Ambiguous Preference Optimization

PLC-DPO corrects noisy preference labels during DPO by routing each pair as clean, flip, or tie using calibrated policy-reference margins.

PLC-DPO addresses reversed, weak, or ambiguous preference labels in Direct Preference Optimization by using the calibrated policy-reference margin as online evidence to route each pair's training signal as clean, flip, or tie. This actively corrects supervision direction and strength rather than only filtering suspicious examples. Across 57 dataset-model-benchmark cells, PLC-DPO achieves the best mean win rate of 60.5 versus 55.5 for the next-best method. Injected-noise and tie stress tests plus human disagreement analysis show the routing stays stable and distinguishes flipped from weakly directional pairs.

Hugging Face daily papers·Aug 30, 20:00 UTC · 17d agoAI research

28

Ask Before You Optimize: Dynamic Pre-Formulation Clarification for Interactive Optimization

Researchers release OR-Clarify, a benchmark testing whether LLM agents ask clarifying questions before formulating optimization models from incomplete requests.

OR-Clarify evaluates pre-formulation clarification in operations research: each task gives a partial problem description, withholds structured hidden slots, and scores agents via bounded interaction with a simulated user, measuring slot recovery, stopping behavior, silent assumptions, and interaction cost. The authors also propose InterOPT, a two-stage framework that identifies formulation-critical gaps to decide when to ask or stop. In choice-based experiments InterOPT substantially outperforms all baselines in exact slot recovery and remains competitive in the open-ended setting.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 3, 20:00 UTC · 13d agoAI research1

35

Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step Transition Lookahead

Theorists prove multi-step lookahead RL planning is NP-hard for every fixed rational discount factor yet give a randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme.

The paper resolves open questions about reinforcement learning with multi-step transition lookahead. It shows exact planning remains NP-hard for every fixed rational discount factor in (0,1), not just discounts arbitrarily close to one, and introduces a randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme for every fixed lookahead depth. Extending to unknown transitions and stochastic rewards via optimism and variance-adaptive confidence bounds, the algorithm achieves cumulative regret matching classical tabular discounted RL up to logarithmic factors.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 10, 16:58 UTC · 6d agoAI research1

22

Learning Multimodal One-step Flow Policy via Value-weighted Optimal Transport

OptiFlow learns one-step multimodal flow policies for offline RL via state-wise entropic optimal transport, avoiding critic overestimation and mode collapse.

The paper introduces OptiFlow, a framework that frames one-step flow policy learning as a structured sample-allocation problem in offline reinforcement learning. It jointly trains a value-aware reference flow policy and a one-step policy, coupling action samples through state-wise entropic optimal transport where critic values set distillation priority and action-distance cost ensures geometrically compatible pairings. By avoiding direct critic maximization, it anchors the policy to high-value dataset-supported modes without out-of-distribution divergence. Code is released on GitHub and the method performs strongly across diverse offline RL benchmarks.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 14, 17:10 UTC · 2d agoAI research

14

Bridging Control, Inference, Transport, and Thermodynamics: From Theory to Applications in Learning

Review connects control theory, optimal transport, probabilistic inference, thermodynamics, and machine learning via free-energy optimization under constraints.

The review unifies five fields: control theory, optimal transport, probabilistic inference, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and machine learning. The common conceptual thread is optimization of free-energy-like functionals under dynamical or statistical constraints. Selected applications are presented in reinforcement learning, variational inference, and generative modeling. The tutorial-style text assumes no prior familiarity and begins from physics principles.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 14, 17:16 UTC · 2d agoAI research

15

Bellman Policy Optimization

Bellman Policy Optimization, a critic-free RLVR method derived from Policy Mirror Descent, improves LLM mathematical reasoning without intermediate state-value estimation.

The paper introduces Bellman Policy Optimization (BPO), a critic-free reinforcement learning method for LLMs with verifiable rewards, derived from Policy Mirror Descent. BPO uses the Bellman equations to reformulate PMD as a trajectory-level objective for autoregressive generation with terminal rewards, avoiding state-value estimation at intermediate states. The authors prove BPO shares the same unique optimal solution as PMD and validate it on mathematical reasoning benchmarks.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 14, 17:59 UTC · 2d agoAI research

38

Entropy-Regularized Rank-Masked Policy Optimization for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation

Researchers propose ERPO, enabling test-time reinforcement learning for code generation via probe-executed consensus rewards, rank masking, and entropy regularization.

The paper introduces probe-driven test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) for code generation, where output-free probe inputs are constructed from problem statements and candidate programs are executed on them to compute a Probe Consensus Reward (PCR). Because PCR can be gamed through spurious consensus, the authors propose Entropy-Regularized Rank-Masked Policy Optimization (ERPO), which turns low-PCR outcomes into conservative negative updates via rank masking and constrains policy drift with an entropy ceiling. On coding benchmarks, ERPO substantially improves pass@1 and pass@k in both in-domain adaptation and zero-shot transfer.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 8, 17:54 UTC · 8d agoAI research1

38

Drift-Constrained Optimization: Only Direction Matters in Fine-Tuning Instruct Models

Drift-Constrained Optimization reformulates fine-tuning as update-direction selection, letting Qwen3 models improve target tasks within a behavioral drift budget.

The paper specifies a behavioral drift budget before optimization and shows that update direction is the remaining degree of freedom, reformulating fine-tuning as a direction-selection problem. In a stringent QA-only setting where instruct models must still generate multi-step reasoning at inference, a coarse layer-selective probe reverses the failure of QA-only fine-tuning. Across Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-14B, these directions substantially improve scientific reasoning and multilingual translation, matching or outperforming dedicated translation systems over 100+ languages and giving stronger initialization for reinforcement learning.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 11, 20:00 UTC · 5d agoAI research

48

Meta FAIR Introduces AI Research Preference Models (RPMs): Ranking ML Experiments Before Spending GPU Hours

Meta FAIR, Oxford and UCL introduce Research Preference Models that rank unexecuted ML experiments, lifting AIRS-Bench scores from 0.684 to 0.729 and cutting compute ~1.6×.

Researchers from Meta FAIR, Oxford, and UCL introduce Research Preference Models (RPMs), which use frozen pretrained LLMs (Qwen3.6-27B backbone, no fine-tuning) to rank unexecuted experiment candidates and execute only the winner of a pairwise knockout tournament. Two variants shipped: an inference-only LLM-as-a-judge and an agentic variant that runs small pilot experiments in an H200 sandbox. On AIRS-Bench (20 tasks, 24 hours on one H200, 10 seeds), scores rise from 0.684 (random) to 0.711 and 0.729 versus a 0.748 validation oracle, and both variants reach the baseline's 24-hour score in roughly 15 hours. The team reports new SOTA on WinoGrande (94.1% with Agentic RPM) and SVAMP (95.7% with inference-only).

MarkTechPost·Sep 6, 20:25 UTC · 10d agoAI research

45

AgentGrad: Intervention-guided Prompt Optimization for Multi Agent Systems

AgentGrad introduces intervention-guided prompt optimization for LLM multi-agent systems, achieving state-of-the-art results with 2.5x faster optimization.

AgentGrad is a prompt optimization framework for LLM-based multi-agent systems that addresses limitations in textual gradient extraction and aggregation. It uses sequential intervention to identify the agent whose prompt modification resolves a given failure, then applies agent-level supervision and semantic gradient clustering to build generalized gradients. Experiments report state-of-the-art performance across five MAS benchmarks and a 2.5x average reduction in wall-clock optimization time versus the next-fastest baseline.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 7, 20:00 UTC · 9d agoAI research

32

Online Learning with LLM Experts from Limited Feedback

Paper proposes bandit algorithms for adaptively routing prompts to LLM experts, minimizing regret under limited feedback budgets.

The paper formulates adaptive prompt routing to K LLM experts as a contextual bandit problem with d prompt features over T rounds. Proposed algorithms strategically select actions and observe rewards, achieving O(dT/m) regret in the full-information setting and O(dTK/m) in the bandit setting, where m is the feedback budget. Experiments demonstrate efficient learning of high-quality routing strategies across diverse LLMs from limited feedback.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 4, 20:00 UTC · 12d agoAI research

25

Silver Rate Is (Almost) Optimal for Gradient Descent Acceleration

New optimization theory paper proves near-optimal lower bounds for gradient descent with predetermined stepsizes, confirming silver-schedule optimality.

The paper studies the limits of accelerating gradient descent using predetermined nonnegative stepsizes in smooth convex optimization, with the key constant p_sil = log2(1 + sqrt(2)). It proves a non-anytime lower bound of Omega(n^(-p_sil - O(sqrt(log log n / log n)))) on the error achievable by any such stepsize schedule. In the anytime setting, it shows every infinite nonnegative schedule must incur error Omega(n^(-2*p_sil/(1+p_sil) - O(sqrt(log log n / log n)))) at infinitely many horizons. Combined with the silver-schedule upper bound of Altschuler and Parrilo (2025) and the anytime upper bound of Zhang et al. (2025), these results determine the optimal polynomial convergence exponents in both settings.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 8, 17:59 UTC · 8d agoAI research

28

Expert-Space Exploration in MoE Reinforcement Learning

ESRL explores MoE expert-routing space during RL post-training, improving Qwen3-30B-A3B Pass@1 by 3.2 points over GRPO without extra compute.

The paper shows perturbing expert routing increases rollout diversity similarly to higher decoding temperature, but naive perturbation degrades quality. ESRL anchors high-confidence experts, restricts stochastic routing to a plausible candidate pool, adapts perturbation strength via router entropy, and replays recorded expert paths during policy optimization. It achieves the best results across top-K, top-1, and shared-expert MoE backbones on math, science, and code tasks; on Qwen3-30B-A3B it improves average Pass@1 and Pass@8 over GRPO by 3.2 and 4.5 percentage points.

Hugging Face daily papers·updated Sep 11, 16:58 UTC · 5d ago·first Sep 10, 20:00 UTC · 6d agoAI research 2 sources

45

Guiding Worker Self-Selection in Crowdsourcing Contests: An LLM-Augmented Algorithmic Approach

Researchers introduce GRAF, a greedy framework for crowdsourcing contest self-selection, and LLMScore, an LLM-driven method that auto-designs its scoring algorithm.

The paper studies self-selection in Tullock contests (SSTC), where workers choose contests and then compete within them. GRAF is a greedy polynomial-time framework that orders workers by a score vector with zero worker regret and platform optimality guarantees in special cases. LLMScore is an LLM-driven evolutionary framework that produces human-readable, inspectable scoring code, jointly optimizing platform utility and worker satisfaction. Across 1,000 synthetic instances in four settings, GRAF with LLMScore achieves high-quality, often near-optimal outcomes with low worker regret, transferring from small training instances to larger, structurally different settings.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 7, 16:51 UTC · 9d agoAI research1

22

Quantile-based Loss Filtering for Outlier-Robust Stochastic Gradient Descent

Quantile-k-Loss SGD filters corrupted component losses by quantile sampling, proving linear convergence while outperforming standard and min-k-loss SGD.

The paper proposes Quantile-k-Loss SGD (Q(k)L-SGD), a loss-filtering framework for finite-sum optimization with corrupted components that samples k losses per iteration and updates using an index from the lower empirical q-quantile. The authors prove linear convergence under standard convexity, requiring sample size to scale with the number of corruptions, plus a complementary small-sample probabilistic analysis. Experiments on polynomial regression, regularized logistic regression, and hinge loss show intermediate quantiles often outperform both standard SGD and min-k-loss SGD.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 11, 16:38 UTC · 5d agoAI research

18

On the Regularization Landscape for the Linear Recommendation Models

Study shows leading linear recommendation models reduce to nuclear-norm or Frobenius-norm regularization, with two new closed-form low-rank solutions proposed.

The paper unifies top-performing linear recommendation algorithms under a single regularization framework, showing they effectively apply either nuclear-norm or Frobenius-norm regularizers. Nuclear-norm solutions have a rigid structure, are low-rank, and have closed form, while Frobenius-norm solutions are more expressive but full-rank or require hard-to-tune procedures such as ADMM. The authors derive two new low-rank, closed-form solutions that combine the advantages of both regularization families.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 10, 17:45 UTC · 6d agoAI research

22

MInTRL: Off-policy Intervention can boost On-policy RL

MInTRL injects sparse judge corrections into on-policy RL rollouts, expanding exploration beyond on-policy sampling while preserving learnability on math and code benchmarks.

Minimal Intervention Reinforcement Learning periodically has a judge-intervention policy replace erroneous suffixes of the current policy's output with short corrections, then returns control, keeping trajectories largely on-policy. Training uses a sequence-level advantage-regression objective that removes the need for importance sampling. Across math and code benchmarks it consistently beats standard on-policy and off-policy baselines, remains effective with self-intervention, and performs best at moderate intervention intensity.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 10, 20:00 UTC · 6d agoAI research

40

ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents

ScienceBuddy couples harness evolution with model reinforcement learning so scientific agents continually self-improve from researcher feedback in an interactive workspace.

The authors release ScienceBuddy, an interactive scientific research workspace that transforms researcher requests, feedback, and execution evidence into tasks and evaluation rubrics for continual learning. Its recursive-in-recursive self-improvement paradigm couples harness evolution (inner recursion, model fixed) with model reinforcement learning under the improved harness (outer recursion). Case studies span four scientific task families, and the system is released to the scientific community as a research product.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 15, 17:55 UTC · 1d agoAI research 2 sources

35

The Surprising Effectiveness of Approximate Value Iteration in Self-Play

Minimal approximate value iteration self-play learns more accurate value functions than AlphaZero in Connect Four and Hex while cutting training and inference costs.

The paper trains a minimal self-play implementation of Approximate Value Iteration (AVI) without MCTS and uses ground-truth oracles for exact evaluation in Connect Four, 7x7 Hex, and synthetic games. AVI learns more accurate value functions than AlphaZero, and its one-step-lookahead greedy policies remain competitive with MCTS-based policies at substantially lower training and inference cost. Preliminary experiments on Othello and 9x9 Go show AVI trains stably on larger games, suggesting simpler approaches have become increasingly practical with modern deep-learning tools.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 8, 17:37 UTC · 8d agoAI research

35

MCRL2: Multi-resource Cross-attention-based Representation Learning-augmented Reinforcement Learning for Cloud Microservice Scheduling

MCRL2 augments reinforcement learning with multi-resource cross-attention representations to improve cloud microservice scheduling and load balancing.

MCRL2 combines a multi-resource cross-attention representation learning module (MCRL) with an actor-critic architecture and maximum entropy objective for microservice scheduling. The approach captures interdependencies among nodes, resources, and microservices in data centers. Experiments on real production cluster traces show improvements in load balancing, scheduling success rate, and average completion time versus baselines.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 11, 16:44 UTC · 5d agoAI research1

15

A positive resolution of the gap-entropy conjecture

New proof resolves the gap-entropy conjecture for Gaussian bandits, bounding optimal best-arm identification samples by H(log(1/delta)+Ent(I)) up to constants.

A paper proves the gap-entropy conjecture for fixed-confidence best-arm identification with independent unit-variance Gaussian arms, means in [0,1], and a unique optimal arm. It shows the optimal expected sample count, averaged over arm-label permutations, is within absolute constant factors of H(log(1/delta)+Ent(I)), where H sums squared gaps and Ent(I) is the instance's gap-entropy. It also gives an instance-independent algorithm bounded by a constant multiple of this quantity plus a g^-2 loglog(e^e/g) term for the smallest gap g.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 9, 17:57 UTC · 7d agoAI research

15

When Does Scale-Invariant Optimization Become Unstable? An Exact Schedule Law with Weight Decay

Researchers derive an exact law linking learning-rate schedules and weight decay in normalized networks, pinpointing when scale-invariant optimization destabilizes.

The paper shows that normalization makes large parts of neural networks scale-invariant, creating a hidden feedback loop where learning-rate schedules and weight decay interact through the parameter norm to control the effective optimizer step. An exact discrete-time law with a single scalar quantity separates contraction- and expansion-dominated effective learning-rate regimes, and the balance point is intrinsically unstable, so constant learning rate with weight decay produces recurrent behavior instead of a stable equilibrium. A unified homogeneous-optimizer framework explains why adaptive methods stabilize more weakly under normalization. The law is validated with high precision on MLPs, CNNs, and GPT-2 across MNIST, CIFAR, WikiText, and OpenWebText, with code released on GitHub.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 8, 17:46 UTC · 8d agoAI research

30

A Unified and Constrained View of Regularization-Based Robust Reinforcement Learning

Paper unifies regularization-based robust RL methods via new performance-gap upper bounds and jointly learned Lagrange multipliers.

The authors derive new upper bounds on the gap between nominal and worst-case deep RL policies, each expressible as an existing regularization objective plus a KL-divergence penalty. Robust training is reformulated as constrained optimization, where prior methods correspond to a fixed Lagrange multiplier. The multiplier is instead updated jointly with the policy, auto-tuning the regularization weight. Adversarial evaluations across several continuous control tasks validate the theory.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 11, 16:45 UTC · 5d agoAI research1

20

Eliciting Weak-to-Strong Generalization with On-Policy Reverse Distillation

OPRD distillation enables weak-to-strong generalization by amplifying verifier-supported policy updates, outperforming existing RL and distillation methods with fewer student updates.

On-Policy Reverse Distillation (OPRD) evaluates a weak teacher's policy shift relative to its reference policy on student rollouts and amplifies the verifier-supported component of the student's policy gradient. This rescaling preserves the stationary points of policy optimization while letting the student learn beyond the teacher's capacity ceiling. In successive model transfer and multi-teacher distillation, OPRD achieves higher performance with fewer student updates than existing RL and distillation approaches, and response-style analysis shows students remain closer to verifier-RL-trained models than to their weak teachers.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 7, 20:00 UTC · 9d agoAI research

33

A Theoretical Analysis of Generalization Dynamics in Neural Networks under Gradient Descent with Weight Decay

Theoretical framework bounds generalization for gradient descent with weight decay, deriving conditions that explain delayed generalization and grokking.

The paper proves convergence of gradient descent with weight decay to a neighborhood of global minimizers of the empirical l2 loss for a broad class of neural networks. It decomposes population error into data, optimization, and prediction variation errors, deriving cellwise and layerwise approximate-homogeneity bounds on prediction variation along the training trajectory. The resulting necessary and sufficient conditions explain layerwise generalization differences and provide a theoretical characterization of grokking.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 7, 16:59 UTC · 9d agoAI research

12

MeClear: Cooperative Game-Theoretic Attribution and Risk-Aware Memory Clearance for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

MeClear uses cooperative Shapley attribution to clear harmful memories from long-horizon LLM agents, boosting task recovery by 25.5 points over baselines.

The paper introduces MeClear, a task-conditioned memory clearance framework for long-horizon LLM agents that identifies and selectively suppresses memories with negative downstream utility without permanently altering the persistent memory bank. It combines Leave-One-Out screening with sampled cooperative Shapley attribution to distribute utility across interacting evidence, resolving redundant conflict masking that single-removal evaluations miss. Across ten long dialogue memory pools it achieves 85.9% target recall and 82.3% overall task recovery, a 25.5 percentage-point improvement over LOO baselines.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 8, 17:46 UTC · 8d agoAI research

32

Safe Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Information Space Reachability

Safe meta-RL framework reasons about safety in information space, learning a safety value function used for safety filtering and constrained policy optimization.

The paper proposes safe meta-RL that reasons about safety in information space, capturing both physical state and the agent's belief over the underlying task. A safety value function measures the probability of avoiding unsafe regions indefinitely and satisfies a self-consistency condition and Bellman equation, making it learnable via meta-RL. The resulting algorithm uses the learned function for safety filtering and constrained policy optimization, with effectiveness demonstrated on meta-RL benchmarks.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 14, 17:27 UTC · 2d agoAI research

25

Learning Sparse Decision Trees via Transformer Variational Auto-Encoders

TREVIS uses a Tree Transformer VAE latent space to learn decision trees matching near-optimal predictive performance while improving structural sparsity.

TREVIS learns decision trees optimized for complex objectives by exploring the latent space of a Tree Transformer Variational Auto-Encoder (TTVAE). Mapping trees to continuous latent representations replaces the discrete search space with a continuous one, enabling gradient-based optimization through a differentiable surrogate model. Experiments show TREVIS matches the predictive performance of near-optimal algorithms while improving structural sparsity, targeting high-stakes contexts needing transparent decision logic.

Hugging Face daily papers·Aug 31, 20:00 UTC · 16d agoAI research

18

Distill Globally, Adapt Locally: Reasoning Distillation and Product-Type Test-Time Training for Scalable Trade-Up Recommendation

A distillation framework compresses LLM reasoning into a 15.5M-parameter trade-up recommendation model reaching AUC 0.941 with product-type test-time training.

The paper targets trade-up recommendation, which identifies higher-quality alternatives that preserve customer purchase intent. A retrieval-augmented few-shot LLM teacher generates labels and rationales that supervise a compact embedding-pair classifier; at inference the 15.5M-parameter student uses only two precomputed 768-dimensional embeddings with no LLM calls. On 8,352 annotated pairs, label-only training scored AUC 0.912, reasoning distillation reached 0.924, and product-type test-time training lifted it to 0.941 with average precision 0.940. The distilled student is roughly 5,000x faster and 10,000x cheaper than direct LLM inference on a 100K-pair proxy catalog.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL·Sep 4, 17:08 UTC · 12d agoAI research

25

Generalized Agent Iteration: One Formal Framework for Iterative Policy Improvement and Recursive Self-Improvement

Generalized Agent Iteration formally unifies iterative policy improvement and recursive self-improvement, defining axes that distinguish anchored, goal-drifting, and self-referential agents.

The paper proposes Generalized Agent Iteration (GAI), a formal framework that models learning as a cycle of agent evaluation and agent improvement, defining the agent as a configuration of modifiable components. Two dials—whether the improving mechanism is part of the agent and whether the evaluation standard is grounded outside it—separate generalized policy iteration (GPI) from recursive self-improvement (RSI) and classify systems as anchored, goal drift, or fully self-referential. The framework places existing systems on shared axes and makes defects of recursive self-improvement statable one condition at a time.

Hugging Face daily papers·Sep 10, 20:00 UTC · 6d agoAI research

30