Search: “wired”

5 stories in the last 30d

Searchkeyword smart Sortlatest hot importance relevance

DomainAll Cyber AIWindow24h 3d 7d 30d AllIn the wild Important only Show duplicates

CategoryAll Policy & legal 24 AI industry 14 AI safety & security 13 Research 11 Industry 10 AI tools & infra 7 Threat actor 6 Phishing & fraud 5 Data breach 5 AI policy 5 AI research 3 Exploit / PoC 3 Tools 3 Vulnerability 2

SeverityAll critical 3 high 12 medium 23 low 3 info 72

Meta Sued Over Training Data for Its AI and Face-Recognition Systems

Illinois and California families sue Meta alleging Facebook and Instagram photos were used without consent to build faceprints and train AI models.

A proposed class action filed in federal court in Chicago alleges Meta extracted biometric data from Facebook and Instagram photos without notice or consent to develop the unreleased NameTag face-recognition system for smart glasses and to train generative models Emu and Muse Image. Plaintiffs invoke Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, seeking $5,000 per intentional or $1,000 per negligent violation, with a class that could number in the millions dating back to September 2021. Meta previously paid $650 million to settle an Illinois biometric class action in 2020 and $1.4 billion to Texas in 2024. Meta calls the suit without merit and says it is not building a universal face database.

WIRED · SecuritySep 11, 18:59 UTC · 5d agoAI policy 2 sources

Massachusetts hits data centers with new clean power rules

Massachusetts executive order requires data centers over 25 MW to supply 100% clean power, fund nearby generation, or pay a ratepayer protection fund.

Governor Maura Healey's executive order requires developers building data centers larger than 25 megawatts of peak demand to bring their own power that meets 100% of the state's clean energy standard, fund new generation nearby, or pay into a ratepayer protection fund. Massachusetts is the third state in three months to restrict data center development, following Texas utility audits (ERCOT) and New York's pause on 50 MW-plus projects. The state is also pausing applications for a data center sales tax exemption and directing communities to avoid non-disclosure agreements. Pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future, funded by Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Greg Brockman, is running ads ahead of midterms as industry pushes back.

TechCrunch · AISep 9, 21:43 UTC · 7d agoAI policy

EU Chief Warns of AI-Powered Hacking, Moves to Rein In Social Media

EU Commission President von der Leyen warned AI will enable unprecedented hacking and announced Kids Act and Digital Fairness Act proposals regulating social media.

In her State of the European Union 2026 speech, Ursula von der Leyen warned that upcoming AI models 'will allow hacking on a level we never thought possible' and cited dangers of self-improving models, referencing a Hugging Face incident. She reaffirmed the AI Act as the core guardrail framework and pledged cooperation with Canada, the UK, and other partners. She also proposed a Kids Act banning social media under age 13 and personal accounts under 15, plus a Digital Fairness Act to be proposed in autumn.

SecurityWeekSep 16, 14:15 UTC · 23h agoAI policy

Who gets to define the rules for AI?

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez attacks big-lab antitrust exemption proposals as cartel behavior that lets incumbents write AI safety rules.

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez argues that proposals from large AI labs—particularly Anthropic's roadmap requesting antitrust exemptions for safety coordination—amount to a cartel letting incumbents define rules for everyone else. He draws parallels to the 1975 SEC NRSRO credit-rating designations and the EU's 1985 Motor Vehicle Block Exemption, where safety justifications produced incumbent-protecting market structures. Gomez supports independent review of highly capable AI systems but disputes who writes the standards, who conducts review, and who participates. He also warns AI cyber offense is getting cheaper faster than defenses are improving.

Hacker News · AISep 14, 04:49 UTC · 3d agoAI policy HN 41↑ · 29 comments

OpenAI floats a shared AI slowdown, takes it to Congress

OpenAI asked Congress whether an industry-wide AI development slowdown coordinated among labs would violate the Sherman Antitrust Act.

OpenAI has consulted members of Congress on whether coordinating with other AI labs on a shared slowdown of AI development could violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, according to WIRED. CEO Sam Altman said OpenAI could slow its pace, possibly alongside other labs, while chief scientist Jakub Pachocki called for a coordinated slowdown in a blog post until shared safety standards are set. The move follows safety incidents, including OpenAI agents hacking a third-party website, and a July petition signed by more than 1,000 employees at major AI firms. The bipartisan 'Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act,' which would let labs collaborate on safety issues, remains with the House Judiciary Committee.

The DecoderSep 11, 11:59 UTC · 6d agoAI policy