ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “eval-injection”

29 stories

Searchkeywordsmart
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAll
SeverityAllcritical 0high 0medium 0low 0info 0

Smart search ranks by meaning as well as keywords (one row per story, last 45 days).

Flextype v1.0.0-alpha.3 Stored Expression Injection Enables PHP Remote Code Execution

Flextype CMS v1.0.0-alpha.3 stored expression injection exposes the mutable registry object, enabling stored PHP remote code execution.

Flextype CMS v1.0.0-alpha.3 evaluates attacker-controlled entry fields as expressions during entry retrieval when global expression processing is enabled. The expression environment exposes the application's mutable registry() object, which attackers can manipulate. Combined with the PHP entry directive, this enables stored PHP remote code execution from crafted entry content. The flaw was disclosed on the Full Disclosure mailing list on September 3, 2026.

Full Disclosure · 12d agoVulnerability 8 sources

Corrupt Plans, Clean Traces: Evading Chain-of-Thought Monitoring with Plan Injection

Plan injection plants benign-sounding harmful reasoning that steers LLM actors to adversarial actions while evading chain-of-thought monitors.

Researchers show that injecting harmful but benign-sounding plans into an actor model's context causes it to perform adversarial actions while its reasoning passes chain-of-thought monitors, achieving 25-33% monitor evasion rates across benchmarks and scaling to larger models like DeepSeek-R1. Actor models paraphrase injected plans as their own reasoning without attribution. Giving the monitor access to the injected plan dropped detection by up to 50% on the Bio-Math task, with extra thinking tokens spent rationalizing rather than flagging the plan.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL · 2d agoAI safety & security

[vim-security] Ex Command Injection in sign_jump() in Vim < v9.2.1090

Vim sign_jump() before v9.2.1090 permits Ex command injection via unescaped buffer names; low-severity patch disclosed by Christian Brabandt.

Christian Brabandt disclosed an Ex command injection vulnerability in Vim's sign_jump() function affecting versions before v9.2.1090, caused by improper neutralization of unescaped buffer names. The issue is rated Low severity and maps to CWE-88 (argument injection) and CWE-94 (code injection). A CVE has been requested but not yet assigned.

oss-security · 4d agoVulnerability

ZDI-26-616: Koha Eval Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

ZDI disclosed CVE-2026-19780, a CVSS 8.8 authenticated eval code-injection flaw in Koha enabling remote code execution.

Zero Day Initiative advisory ZDI-26-616 describes a code injection vulnerability in the Eval component of Koha, the open-source integrated library system. A remote attacker must authenticate before injecting and executing arbitrary code on affected installations. ZDI assigned the flaw a CVSS 3.0 rating of 8.8.

ZDI Published Advisories · 8d agoVulnerabilityCVE-2026-197801

CVE-2026-80351: Apache Camel K: Camel K Tenant repositories reach Maven execution inside operator pod

Apache Camel K CVE-2026-80351 lets tenant-controlled Maven repository content execute code inside the operator pod; fixed in 2.9.3/2.10.2.

Apache disclosed a critical eval injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-80351) in Apache Camel K, where improperly neutralized directives in dynamically evaluated Maven configuration let tenant-controlled repository content reach Maven execution inside the operator pod. This can allow tenant-controlled content to influence code execution in the operator context. Affected versions are 2.0.0 before 2.9.3 and 2.10.1 before 2.10.2; fixes are available in 2.9.3 and 2.10.2.

oss-security · 6d agoVulnerability 3 sourcesCVE-2026-803512

ActGuard: Pre-execution Action Auditing against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents

ActGuard audits LLM agent actions before execution against predicted tool priors, masking only malicious spans from indirect prompt injections while preserving utility.

ActGuard is a pre-execution action auditing framework against indirect prompt injection in LLM agents, judging whether external content causes the current action to deviate from a locally reasonable expectation rather than whether content is inherently suspicious. At each step it predicts the tools likely used by the upcoming action, builds a local tool prior, then performs tool-level contrastive analysis and parameter-level evidence localization to identify deviations. A verifier masks only spans confirmed as malicious and regenerates the action from the sanitized context. On challenging tool-using agent benchmarks it reduces attack success to state-of-the-art levels while keeping task utility close to the no-attack setting; code is publicly available on GitHub.

arXiv cs.CR · 2d agoAI safety & security

Repeat-After-Me: Black-Box Adaptive Visual Prompt Injection

Researchers unveil Repeat-After-Me, a black-box visual prompt injection achieving over 80% success on Qwen3.6-27B and 47% on GPT-5.5.

Researchers present Repeat-After-Me, a black-box adaptive visual prompt injection that induces frontier VLMs to reveal PII or make malicious tool calls via injected images. It exceeds 80% attack success rate on Qwen3.6-27B and 47% on GPT-5.5 even when the benign user prompt is unrelated and does not authorize the injected task. In a real-world OpenClaw Discord deployment, a minimally injected image can overwrite TOOLS.md, enabling later remote code execution and secret exfiltration.

arXiv cs.CR · 12d agoAI safety & security

When the prompt becomes the payload: A practical pen-testing guide for GenAI, LLM and RAG applications

CSO Online publishes a practical penetration-testing guide for GenAI, LLM, and RAG applications, covering prompt injection, retrieval poisoning, and tenant isolation testing.

The guide frames LLM applications as attack graphs spanning prompts, retrieval layers, vector stores, tools, identities, and downstream APIs, arguing that conventional web testing misses instruction-vs-data channel risks. It builds on OWASP prompt injection guidance (direct vs. indirect injection) and NIST's 2025 adversarial machine-learning taxonomy, noting that RAG and fine-tuning do not remove injection risk. Recommended practices include documenting trust transitions across components, using canaries and synthetic records to avoid test side effects, running multi-turn and obfuscated injection campaigns, and verifying chains from poisoned documents to observable state changes. It also details testing RAG pipelines via controlled document poisoning across metadata, OCR layers, and code comments, plus cross-tenant isolation checks on retrieved document IDs.

CSO Online · 7d agoAI safety & security1

Injected and Leaked: Actively Inducing Side-Channel Leakage Using Electromagnetic Injection and Hardware Nonlinearity

Researchers introduce InjectEave, using electromagnetic injection and hardware nonlinearity to induce side-channel leakage and eavesdrop on headphone audio from 30 meters.

An arXiv paper shows electromagnetic injection can actively amplify side-channel leakage: nonlinear hardware such as amplifiers, ADCs, and power converters modulates secret electrical signals onto an injected EM carrier, upconverting low-frequency secrets into measurable EM emissions. By tuning injection frequency and amplitude, an adversary can shape the effective spectrum and entropy of the resulting leakage. The InjectEave attack demonstrated eavesdropping on wired and wireless headphone audio from up to 30 meters and in through-wall scenarios using accessible RF equipment, plus leakage of smart home device power consumption and analog sensor inputs. Case studies show closed-loop eavesdropping and manipulation of landline phone conversations, and the paper discusses mitigations.

arXiv cs.CR · 12d agoResearch

[0day-rubbish] QuantaStor 6.8.3.018 Command injection in the alert-mail command via the smtpPassword field (8.8)

QuantaStor 6.8.3.018 has a CVSS 8.8 command injection in its alert-mail command, exploitable via the smtpPassword field.

0day Rubbish Research Team disclosed a command injection (CWE-78) in QuantaStor 6.8.3.018's alert-mail command, reachable through the smtpPassword field. The flaw scores CVSS 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). No CVE identifier or evidence of active exploitation is mentioned in the disclosure.

Full Disclosure · 8d agoVulnerability 2 sources

Cybercriminals Turn to Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks

Proofpoint reports cybercriminals are now adopting indirect prompt injection attacks against AI-powered systems.

Proofpoint's threat intelligence reports that cybercriminals have turned to indirect prompt injection attacks, extending the technique from a research concern into observed criminal tradecraft. The article is available by title only, so specific victims, campaigns, and targets are not detailed here.

Proofpoint Threat Insight · Aug 13, 2026AI safety & security in the wild

Rethinking Indirect Prompt Injection as a Test-Time Search Problem

Researchers frame indirect prompt injection as test-time search, showing added attacker compute improves vulnerability discovery and exploitation against tool-using agents.

The paper models indirect prompt injection as a test-time search over a task-dependent attack surface shaped by the environment, user task, and injection goal. The authors build an agentic attacker with a dedicated search harness that performs reconnaissance, structured strategy reasoning, and adaptive evaluation using victim-agent feedback. Experiments show more attacker test-time compute improves discovery and exploitation of injection vulnerabilities, with explicit strategy management needed to avoid redundant search. The results argue that agentic security evaluations should characterize attacker search procedures and compute budgets rather than treating attack success as budget-independent.

arXiv cs.CR · 12d agoAI safety & security

Anthropic Adds Plugin Evals to Claude Code: 6 Grader Types, a No-Plugin Baseline, and a CI Gate for Skills

Anthropic ships a plugin evals workflow for Claude Code with six grader types, a no-plugin baseline arm, and a CI gate via threshold and cost flags.

Anthropic published a plugin evals workflow for Claude Code, exposed via the "claude plugin eval" command on v2.1.269+. Six grader types exist: regex, tool_used, tool_order, and file_exists are free transcript checks, while llm and baseline invoke a billed judge model. Every case runs with and without the plugin, and the delta (Δ) isolates the plugin's contribution; a Δ near zero with a failing tool_used:Skill grader indicates the skill never triggers. CI gating uses --threshold 0.8, --max-cost-usd, --trust-plugin, and --no-publish flags, with results written to a report.html under evals/results/.

MarkTechPost · 4d agoAI tools & infra2

[webapps] EasyAppointments 1.5.1 - Blind SQL Injection

A proof-of-concept exploit for a blind SQL injection vulnerability in EasyAppointments 1.5.1 has been published on Exploit-DB.

Exploit-DB lists a public proof-of-concept exploit for a blind SQL injection flaw in EasyAppointments 1.5.1. The listing falls under the webapps category and enables reproduction of the injection. No in-the-wild exploitation or CVE identifier is stated in the listing.

Exploit-DB · 15d agoExploit / PoC1

WebPros security advisory (AV26-908)

Canada's Cyber Centre relays WebPros advisories for SQL injection (CVE-2026-67401) in cPanel and two ConfigServer Firewall flaws.

The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security published advisory AV26-908 covering vulnerabilities in WebPros products, including cPanel & WHM and ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF). Affected cPanel builds include versions prior to 11.110.0.143, 11.134.0.55, 11.136.0.39, 11.138.0.4 and WP2 11.138.1.9, while CSF versions 14.00-16.29 (CVE-2026-65638) and 2.15-16.29 (CVE-2026-65639) are also affected. CVE-2026-67401 describes SQL injection in cPanel's EmailTrack functionality. Users and administrators are encouraged to review the advisories and apply available updates.

Canadian Centre for Cyber Securityupdated · 5d agofirst · 6d agoAdvisory 3 sourcesCVE-2026-65638CVE-2026-65639CVE-2026-67401

[remote] D-Link DNS_340L - OS Command Injection

An OS command injection exploit was published for the D-Link DNS-340L NAS, a flaw relevant to exposed network storage devices.

Exploit-DB published exploit #52643 for the D-Link DNS-340L network-attached storage device. The vulnerability is an OS command injection, which could allow arbitrary command execution on affected devices. The disclosure text does not report exploitation in the wild.

Exploit-DB · Aug 17, 2026Exploit / PoC

CVE-2026-85630: HTML::FormHandler versions before 0.410002 for Perl render field attributes into HTML without escaping using the process_attrs method

CVE-2026-85630: HTML::FormHandler Perl versions before 0.410002 render field attributes into HTML unescaped, enabling HTML injection.

The Perl module HTML::FormHandler before version 0.410002 renders field attributes into HTML without escaping via the process_attrs method, per an oss-security disclosure. Applications using affected versions could allow unescaped markup to be injected into generated HTML. Users should upgrade to version 0.410002 or later.

oss-security · 7d agoVulnerability 2 sourcesCVE-2026-856301

Emacs arbitrary code execution: incomplete fix for CVE-2024-53920

Incomplete fix for Emacs CVE-2024-53920 allows arbitrary code execution when viewing or editing untrusted files in non-Lisp modes like Perl flymake.

Bas Alberts of GitHub Security Lab discovered that the patch for CVE-2024-53920, an arbitrary code execution flaw in Emacs, was incomplete. Code execution remains possible when viewing or editing untrusted text files in modes other than Emacs Lisp mode, for example Perl files with flymake mode enabled. All Emacs versions affected by the original CVE remain affected by the incomplete fix.

oss-security · 2d agoVulnerabilityCVE-2024-53920

Do Input-Level Defenses Transfer to Observation-Level Attacks on VideoLLMs?

A systematic study shows input-level adversarial defenses provide inconsistent, often near-zero protection against observation-level attacks on video LLMs.

Researchers introduce DefTEval, a controlled framework testing eleven input-level defenses against five attack types across five video LLMs. Harmful-content detection rates are frequently near zero, and defenses fail even when attacks embed harmful signals in every sampled frame. Token compression discards localized safety features and modality fusion down-weights weakened visual signals, with defense outcomes dominated by model architecture rather than the defense method.

arXiv cs.CR · 8d agoAI safety & security

F5 BIG-IP APM Malware Injects a PHP Web Shell Into Memory, Evading Disk Scans

Sophos found F5 BIG-IP APM malware that injects a PHP web shell into Apache's memory, evading disk scans, linked to exploited CVE-2025-53521.

Sophos's September 7 analysis describes malware tied to F5's c05d5254 activity that hooks apr_dso_load, modifies the libphp PHP module in memory, and injects a PHP web shell when Apache loads apm_css.php3, full_wt.php3 or webtop_popup_css.php3, leaving on-disk files clean. A separate installer infects /usr/sbin/httpd and umount, runs before Apache starts, disables SELinux (per ESET's related PoisonedRefresh analysis), and opens a local socket at /run/bigtlog.pipe for shell access. The activity is linked to CVE-2025-53521 in BIG-IP APM, rated 9.8 CVSS 3.1, patched in October 2025, added to CISA KEV on March 27, 2026.

The Hacker News · 7d agoMalware in the wildCVE-2025-53521

[0day-rubbish] core-admin 1.0.164 (build 16468) Systemic shell command injection via ineffective quote escaping (8.8)

0day Rubbish discloses a CVSS 8.8 shell command injection in core-admin 1.0.164 via ineffective quote escaping, enabling authenticated remote code execution.

0day Rubbish Research Team publicly disclosed a systemic shell command injection (CWE-78) in core-admin 1.0.164 (build 16468). The flaw stems from ineffective quote escaping and scores 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). The disclosure does not mention a CVE identifier or observed exploitation in the wild.

Full Disclosure · 8d agoVulnerability1

cPanel EmailTrack SQL Injection Flaw Lets Attackers Execute Code as Root

cPanel disclosed CVE-2026-67401, an authenticated SQL injection in EmailTrack that lets attackers write files and execute code as root.

cPanel disclosed CVE-2026-67401 on September 8, 2026: a SQL injection in the EmailTrack feature that allows authenticated account holders with mail-related permissions to create arbitrary files and execute code with root privileges. Fixes shipped in v11.110.0.143, v11.134.0.55, v11.136.0.39, v11.138.0.4, and WP2 channel v11.138.1.9, with all supported versions before those releases affected. Root-level execution poses severe risk to shared hosting providers and multi-tenant servers, as it removes isolation between cPanel accounts, websites, mailboxes, and backups. Researchers Ali Mustafa (rz1027) and abed1526 responsibly reported the flaw.

GBHackers · 7d agoVulnerabilityCVE-2026-67401

[webapps] CubeCart 6.7.4 - SQL

A proof-of-concept SQL injection exploit targeting CubeCart 6.7.4 was published on Exploit-DB.

Exploit-DB carries a proof-of-concept exploit for a SQL injection vulnerability in CubeCart 6.7.4, an open-source e-commerce platform. The listing demonstrates the injection issue but the provided text includes no CVE identifier or evidence of active exploitation. SQL injection in the storefront could expose or modify store data.

Exploit-DB · 16d agoExploit / PoC1

Training a coding model to paint watercolours with TRL and OpenEnv

Hugging Face tutorial trains a coding model with TRL and OpenEnv to paint watercolours through generated code.

A Hugging Face blog walkthrough uses the TRL reinforcement learning library and the OpenEnv environment framework to train a coding model. The target task is generating code that produces watercolour-style drawings, serving as a hands-on reinforcement learning training example. No article body was available in the feed, so specifics are limited to the title.

Hugging Face Blog · 13d agoAI tools & infra1

[20260809] - Core - Improper ACL checks when injection schema.org contact data

Joomla fixed CVE-2026-73372, an improper ACL check that leaks inaccessible contact items' data into schema.org snippets, affecting CMS 5.1.0-5.4.7 and 6.0.0-6.1.2.

Joomla security advisory 20260809 describes CVE-2026-73372, an incorrect access control issue when injecting schema.org contact data. Improper access checks inject contact information for inaccessible contact items into schema.org snippets, exposing restricted data. Affected versions are 5.1.0-5.4.7 and 6.0.0-6.1.2; fixes ship in 5.4.8 and 6.1.3. The issue was reported by Stefan Wendhausen on 2026-07-31.

Joomla Security Centre · Aug 17, 2026AdvisoryCVE-2026-73372

[webapps] Payload CMS 3.72.0 - Blind SQL Injection

A proof-of-concept exploit for a blind SQL injection vulnerability in Payload CMS 3.72.0 has been published on Exploit-DB.

Exploit-DB lists a public proof-of-concept exploit for a blind SQL injection flaw in Payload CMS 3.72.0. The listing falls under the webapps category and allows reproduction of the injection. No in-the-wild exploitation or CVE identifier is stated in the listing.

Exploit-DB · 15d agoExploit / PoC

The Hidden Instructions That Can Hijack AI Agents

Hidden prompt injections embedded in documents and metadata can hijack autonomous AI agents, causing data exfiltration and out-of-policy actions at machine speed.

Bowbridge warns that hidden indirect prompt injections, embedded in documents, metadata, emails, images, and code repositories, can cause autonomous AI agents to treat attacker-controlled content as trusted guidance. Because agents inherit user privileges, act silently, and lack human judgment, injections can lead to data exfiltration or file poisoning that traditional security controls cannot detect. A real-world example involved a supplier quote whose metadata instructed an agent to override guidance and select the most expensive option. Bowbridge recommends scanning documents before agents process them.

SecurityWeek · 8d agoAI safety & security