Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

DeepMind unveils Gemini Robotics 2.5 and ASIMOV-jailbreak benchmark

Original title: DeepMind reveals Gemini Robotics 2.5 and open safety benchmark "ASIMOV-jailbreak"

Ars Technica · AIby Ryan Whitwam ()5 min read
Part of a story covered by 3 sourcesDeepMind rolls out Gemini Robotics 2.5 after Mercedes pilotMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Apollo 2 robots kitted parts in Mercedes factories at 96% success; the open jailbreak set has 1,500 prompts.

Google DeepMind released Gemini Robotics 2.5, a vision-language-action model it says is 30 to 100 percent more successful and 20 to 30 percent faster than the prior version on more than 200 lab tasks. With Apptronik, Gemini-powered Apollo 2 robots kitted automotive parts in a few European Mercedes-Benz factories at a 96 percent success rate. DeepMind also opened ASIMOV-Jailbreak, 1,500 prompts meant to elicit unsafe robot actions, reporting 98.8 percent safety with Gemini 4 Argon in the loop versus 73.5 percent with Gemini Robotics ER 2 alone. The 2.5 release still runs on cloud servers.

Unconfirmed: Success-rate and jailbreak-safety figures are Google’s own lab and factory measurements, not an independent evaluation.

Key facts
  • Apptronik’s Apollo 2 with Gemini Robotics 2.5 was shown tying a bow.
  • Obstacle handling raised safe task completion 33 percent, and 43 percent with people nearby.
  • Gemini 4 Argon generated simulation variants from real camera data for training.
  • ASIMOV-Jailbreak is published on Hugging Face; general availability of 2.5 is not stated.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

5 min read at arstechnica.com

Two Gemini-powered robots hard at work in a Mercedes-Benz factory. Two Gemini-powered robots hard at work in a Mercedes-Benz factory. Google DeepMind has revealed a new generation of the AI-powered Gemini Robotics platform.

Ars Technica · AI

By Ryan Whitwam · arstechnica.com

Read the full article at Ars Technica · AI

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.