Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Exploit / PoClowExploited in the wild

Decline in Rig Exploit Kit

Palo Alto Unit 42by Brad Duncan ()5 min read2
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Rig exploit kit activity dropped roughly 75% after the pseudo-Darkleech and EITest campaigns stopped using EKs, reflecting an overall decline in exploit kit activity.

Rig EK activity fell sharply in 2017: the pseudo-Darkleech campaign disappeared at the end of March, cutting Rig traffic about 50%, and the EITest campaign switched to tech support scams in late April, cutting another 50% in May. Broader causes include a shrinking browser target base, no major EK zero-day in over a year, and community takedowns of domain shadowing infrastructure. Criminals are shifting to malspam, social engineering schemes like fake HoeflerText notifications, and tech support scams.

Key facts
  • Pseudo-Darkleech's disappearance in late March 2017 cut Rig EK traffic by about 50%
  • EITest's April 2017 switch to tech support scams cut Rig activity another 50% in May
  • Decline driven by shrinking IE/Edge target base, lack of new EK exploits, and domain shadowing takedowns
  • Criminals increasingly use malspam, fake installers, and tech support scams for malware distribution
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

5 min read at unit42.paloaltonetworks.com

Starting in April 2017, we saw a significant decrease in Rig exploit kit (EK) activity after two major campaigns, EITest and pseudo-Darkleech , stopped using EKs. Figure 1 shows the hits for the Rig EK from December 2016 through May 2017, highlighting this trend. This blog reviews recent developments in the EITest and pseudo-Darkleech campaigns that have contributed to the current drop in Rig EK.

Palo Alto Unit 42

By Brad Duncan · unit42.paloaltonetworks.com

Read the full article at Palo Alto Unit 42

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.