Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Siemens Desigo CC family

CISA Advisoriesby CISA ()3 min read4
Part of a story covered by 4 sourcesCISA republishes four Siemens ICS flaws and retracts one CVEMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Siemens Desigo CC graphics documents can run attacker scripts and compromise client operating systems.

CISA republished Siemens SSA-330084 covering CVE-2026-34223, a client code-execution flaw in the Desigo CC building-management family. Scripts embedded in user-defined graphics are not sufficiently validated and run when a privileged user opens a crafted document, allowing arbitrary file writes on the client. CVSS 3.1 is 8.2, with local access and user interaction required. All Desigo CC V6 and V7 versions are listed as affected. Michelin CERT reported the issue; no exploitation is stated.

Key facts
  • CVE-2026-34223 is client code injection scored CVSS 8.2.
  • Crafted graphics documents execute scripts when a privileged user opens them.
  • Attackers can write arbitrary files and compromise the client operating system.
  • Every Desigo CC family V6 and V7 release is listed as affected.
Analyze CVE-2026-34223 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-34223
Client Code Execution via malicious graphics documents in Siemens Desigo CC
8.6<1%

From the original article

3 min read at cisa.gov

View CSAF Summary A Client Code Execution (CCE) vulnerability has been identified in Desigo CC, potentially allowing malicious actors to execute arbitrary code on client devices through specially crafted graphics documents. This vulnerability leverages user-defined graphics containing embedded scripts that are executed on client application instances.

CISA Advisories

By CISA · cisa.gov

Read the full article at CISA Advisories

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.