Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Sandworm wiped a Ukrainian grain firm after UAC-0099 access

Original title: Russian hackers teamed up to wipe data at Ukrainian grain firm

The Record ()2 min read
Part of a story covered by 3 sourcesUAC-0099 and Sandworm wiped a Ukrainian grain firmMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

ESET says a July 2025 phishing foothold led to a September wipe, using a new backdoor that talked over Yggdrasil.

ESET says the Russia-aligned group UAC-0099 and Sandworm jointly hit an unnamed Ukrainian grain logistics company. Phishing in July 2025 installed the MatchWok backdoor, followed by the previously unseen MythicRatatoskr tool for remote commands, file theft and screenshots. Researchers believe access was then handed to Sandworm, linked to Russia's GRU, which wiped data in September. Malware hid its traffic on the decentralized Yggdrasil network.

Unconfirmed: The UAC-0099-to-Sandworm handoff is ESET's assessment, and which group ran MythicRatatoskr is unresolved.

Key facts
  • The intrusion began with a phishing email that carried a malicious attachment.
  • MythicRatatoskr has not been seen elsewhere, and a Linux variant may exist.
  • ESET could not tell which group mainly operated the new backdoor.
  • Yggdrasil carried encrypted traffic without a conventional central server.
  • UAC-0099 has targeted Ukrainian government, finance, media and industry since at least 2022.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Network access, stolen files, screenshots and wiped company data

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at therecord.media

The Russian state-linked hacking group Sandworm collaborated with another threat actor to carry out a destructive cyberattack against a Ukrainian grain logistics company last year, researchers said Thursday.

The Record

therecord.media

Read the full article at The Record

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.