ZeroHour
Security Affairspublished ()ingested @securityaffairs

Attackers exploit FortiGate devices to access sensitive network info

Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2025-59718
Critical FortiCloud SSO Authentication Bypass in Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy

CVE-2025-59718 is a critical (CVSS 9.8) improper verification of cryptographic signature flaw (CWE-347) in the FortiCloud SSO login flow of Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager, with the Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 appliance also listed in the CVE's affected CPE entries. An unauthenticated attacker who can reach a device's FortiCloud SSO login can submit a crafted SAML response message whose cryptographic signature is not properly verified, bypassing authentication entirely. The bypass grants unauthorized access to the affected device with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, typically administrative control of the management interface. Any organization running the affected FortiOS 7.0–7.6, FortiProxy 7.0–7.6, or FortiSwitchManager 7.0–7.2 versions that uses FortiCloud SSO for administrative login is exposed. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: the flaw was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2025-12-16, security reporting describes active attacks against FortiGate firewalls via this SAML SSO bypass, and EPSS assigns a 68.3% probability of exploitation within 30 days.

Do: Upgrade all affected products out of the vulnerable ranges — FortiOS beyond 7.6.3/7.4.8/7.2.11/7.0.17, FortiProxy beyond 7.6.3/7.4.10/7.2.14/7.0.21, and FortiSwitchManager beyond 7.2.6/7.0.5 — using the fixed builds listed in Fortinet's security advisory, and patch Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 firmware per Siemens guidance. As interim mitigation, disable or restrict FortiCloud SSO-based administrative login, limit management-interface exposure to trusted networks, and review admin/SSO logs for anomalous sign-ins or forged SAML responses. Given the KEV listing, US federal agencies must apply vendor mitigations or discontinue use of affected products per BOD 22-01.

9.868% KEV
  • Fortinet FortiOS 7.0.0-7.0.17, 7.2.0-7.2.11, 7.4.0-7.4.8, 7.6.0-7.6.3
  • Fortinet FortiProxy 7.0.0-7.0.21, 7.2.0-7.2.14, 7.4.0-7.4.10, 7.6.0-7.6.3
  • Fortinet FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0-7.0.5, 7.2.0-7.2.6
  • +1 more
masslikely on the order of 100,000+ internet-exposed FortiOS/FortiProxy systems (Fortinet's deployed base is in the millions); the directly exploitable set is the…
CVE-2025-59719
Unauthenticated SAML Signature Bypass in Fortinet FortiWeb (FortiCloud SSO)

FortiWeb contains an improper verification of cryptographic signature (CWE-347) in its FortiCloud SSO login flow, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication by submitting a crafted SAML response whose signature is not properly validated. Because this requires no privileges or user interaction and is network-reachable, successful exploitation grants the attacker the access of a legitimate SSO-authenticated administrator to the appliance's management interface. The flaw affects FortiWeb 8.0.0, 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, and 7.4.0 through 7.4.9. Organizations running these versions are affected, particularly where the management interface is reachable and FortiCloud SSO login is enabled. As of this analysis the flaw is not in the CISA KEV catalog and no public proof-of-concept is known, but a closely related SAML SSO authentication bypass in FortiGate firewalls (CVE-2025-59718) is under active attack and Fortinet has issued urgent authentication patches, so elevated exploitation risk is plausible.

Do: Upgrade FortiWeb to a patched release per Fortinet's PSIRT advisory covering CVE-2025-59719, prioritizing internet-facing appliances on 8.0.0, 7.6.x, or 7.4.x. As interim mitigation, restrict access to the management interface, disable or limit FortiCloud SSO login in favor of local or hardened admin authentication, and review SSO login logs for successful authentications from unexpected sources. Note that the sibling FortiGate SAML bypass (CVE-2025-59718) is being actively exploited, so treat this patch as urgent.

9.829%
  • fortinet fortiweb 8.0.0
  • fortinet fortiweb 7.6.0 through 7.6.4
  • fortinet fortiweb 7.4.0 through 7.4.9
largetens of thousands of internet-exposed FortiWeb appliances (order of magnitude ~10k-100k), with the exploitable subset limited to deployments using FortiCloud…
CVE-2026-24858
FortiCloud SSO Authentication Bypass Across Multiple Fortinet Products

CVE-2026-24858 is an authentication bypass (CWE-288) in FortiCloud single sign-on that lets an attacker who owns a FortiCloud account with any registered device log in to other customers' Fortinet devices that have FortiCloud SSO authentication enabled. It affects a wide range of 7.x/8.x builds of FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiWeb, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiNAC-F, and the Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE 1808. An attacker gains unauthorized access to devices registered to other accounts, and related reporting describes FortiGate devices being exploited to breach networks and steal service account credentials. Any organization running an affected build with FortiCloud SSO enabled is exposed. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: CISA added the flaw to the KEV catalog on 2026-01-27 and Fortinet patched it after active FortiOS SSO exploitation was detected, and EPSS assigns an 86.1% probability of exploitation within 30 days.

Do: Upgrade all affected Fortinet products to the fixed releases specified in Fortinet's PSIRT advisory for CVE-2026-24858; as an interim mitigation, disable FortiCloud SSO authentication on affected devices and audit which devices are registered to your FortiCloud account. Review device logs for unexpected administrative logins or signs of service-account credential theft on FortiGate, and federal agencies must apply mitigations per BOD 22-01 (including CISA's cloud services guidance) or discontinue use of the product.

9.886% KEV
  • Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0-7.6.5, 7.4.0-7.4.9, 7.2.0-7.2.11, 7.0.0-7.0.15
  • Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.0-7.6.5, 7.4.0-7.4.9, 7.2.0-7.2.11, 7.0.0-7.0.15
  • Fortinet FortiNAC-F 7.6.3-7.6.5
  • +4 more
masshundreds of thousands of devices potentially affected (Fortinet's FortiGate install base is in the millions and public internet scans have long shown hundreds…
Full article549 words · extracted from securityaffairs.com · click to collapse

Attackers are exploiting FortiGate devices to breach networks and steal configuration data containing service account credentials and network details.

SentinelOne researchers warn that attackers are exploiting vulnerabilities or weak credentials in FortiGate devices to gain initial access to corporate networks. Once inside, they extract configuration files that may contain service account credentials and information about the internal network structure. The campaign appears to target sectors such as healthcare, government agencies, and managed service providers.

“Throughout early 2026, SentinelOne’s® Digital Forensics & Incident Response (DFIR) team has responded to several incidents where FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) appliances have been compromised to establish a foothold into the targeted environment.” states SentinelOne. “Each incident was detected and stopped during the lateral movement phase of the attack.”

FortiGate appliances, often integrated with AD and LDAP, allow role mapping and fast response for network alerts. Threat actors have abused this access by targeting CVE-2025-59718 and CVE-2025-59719, exploiting SSO signature validation flaws to gain unauthenticated admin access. CVE-2026-24858 allowed attackers to log in through FortiCloud SSO. Once inside, they can extract configuration files containing service accounts, while others exploit weak credentials without needing a vulnerability.

In one case analyzed by Sentinel One, attackers created local admin accounts, modified firewall policies, and periodically checked access before extracting configuration files containing encrypted LDAP service account credentials. These were decrypted to authenticate to Active Directory and enroll rogue workstations, allowing deeper network access.

In another incident, attackers created admin accounts, deployed Pulseway and MeshAgent RMM tools, and used PowerShell and DLL side-loading to execute malware. They staged malicious payloads on cloud storage (Google Cloud, AWS S3), ran tasks to maintain persistence, and used PsExec to move laterally.

The attackers made a backup of the main domain controller, took the NTDS.dit file and SYSTEM registry data, compressed them, and uploaded them to their servers. After the incident was contained, no further misuse of accounts was seen.

Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs), like FortiGate, are widely used because they combine strong network security with features like Active Directory integration. This makes them high-value targets for attackers, from state-sponsored espionage groups to financially motivated criminals. Recent research shows that even less skilled actors can now exploit these devices more easily using AI tools like large language models (LLMs), which provide guidance on navigating networks and extracting sensitive data.

Organizations should secure NGFWs by enforcing strong administrative controls, keeping software patched, and maintaining adequate log retention (at least 14–90 days). Logs should be sent to a SIEM system to detect anomalies, track unauthorized account creation, monitor for configuration access, spot malware or C2 traffic, preserve evidence, and enable automated responses to neutralize threats quickly.

“Organizations should consider that FortiGate and other edge devices typically do not permit security software to be installed on the appliance, such as endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. The best defense for these appliances is to apply strong administrative access controls and to keep the software patched to prevent exploitation.” concludes the report. “Further, both of these investigations were hindered by insufficient FortiGate log retention. Organizations should ensure they have at least 14 days of log retention on NGFW appliances like FortiGate, though 60-90 days is much better when possible.”

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Fortinet)



Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://securityaffairs.com/189241/security/attackers-exploit-fortigate-devices-to-access-sensitive-network-information.html