Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Closed-World Resolution Against Tool Hallucination in LLM Agents

arXiv cs.CRby Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer ()1 min read3
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Benchmark across ten LLMs documents 322 tool hallucinations and 154 more on MCP, showing model scale does not help and gates cannot reject fabricated calls.

The paper presents a five-class taxonomy (H1-H5) of tool hallucination in LLM agents, where models call nonexistent tools or pass arguments no schema declares, a blind spot no gating defense can reject since no gate made the decision. Across ten hosted models on two invocation surfaces, researchers measured 322 genuine hallucinations, concentrated on the unconstrained raw-JSON surface (34 versus 3), with model scale offering no benefit as a 675B model matched a 7-8B one. On the Model Context Protocol, merging servers into one namespace produced 154 hallucinations, including from frontier models that were clean on the single-registry surface. The versioned Hallucinated-Tools Benchmark (HTB) is released for comparable resolver evaluation.

Key facts
  • Five-class taxonomy (H1-H5) of tool hallucination, with proof that defense must precede any gate.
  • 322 genuine hallucinations measured across ten hosted models on two invocation surfaces.
  • Fabricated-tool calls concentrate on unconstrained raw-JSON surfaces: 34 versus 3.
  • MCP server merging creates collision and shadowing surfaces causing 154 hallucinations, including frontier models.
  • Versioned Hallucinated-Tools Benchmark (HTB) released for comparable resolver evaluation.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Tool-augmented large language model (LLM) agents fail in a way no tool-selection or tool-security method addresses: they call tools that do not exist and pass arguments no schema declares. Existing defenses either pick the right tool (selection) or constrain what an agent may do with real tools (gating), both of which presuppose the emitted call refers to a real tool at all.

arXiv cs.CR

By Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.