Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Phishing & fraudmediumExploited in the wild

Fake Claude Max giveaway tricks users into handing over their Google account credentials

Help Net Securityby Sinisa Markovic ()2 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Malwarebytes found a fake Claude Max giveaway that steals Google credentials via a spoofed sign-in.

Malwarebytes found a phishing page copying Claude branding that claims Anthropic is giving away 10,000 free one-month Claude Max subscriptions. A countdown advertising fewer than 760 remaining slots is generated locally and resets when the page reloads. Clicking Google draws a draggable fake browser window with a padlock and a correctly spelled Google sign-in address, after a human-verification step. The phishing function loads from an external reusable widget whose comments are in Russian and call the visitor the victim; a compromised Google account can expose email, documents, password resets, and Claude access.

Key facts
  • Fake page offers 10,000 free one-month Claude Max subscriptions.
  • A shrinking slot counter is generated in the browser and resets on reload.
  • Only the Google button proceeds; Apple and email options are disabled.
  • A draggable fake browser window shows a correctly spelled Google address.
  • Credential-stealing code loads from a reusable widget with Russian comments.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

A fake Claude Max giveaway uses a spoofed Google sign-in window to steal users’ login credentials, Malwarebytes researchers have found. “Browser-in-the-browser” is not a new technique. Researchers have documented it since 2022, and in June Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 reported a campaign that used draggable fake browser windows to target Microsoft 365 users.

Help Net Security

By Sinisa Markovic · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.