Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
MalwaremediumExploited in the wild

Videostrong backdoored 1.3 million Android TV boxes

Original title: A hidden backdoor put 1.3 million TV boxes to work for criminals

Malwarebytes Labsby @MetallicaMVP ()3 min read1
Part of a story covered by 16 sourcesGoogle Disrupts XCPE Botnet Linked to VideostrongMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Google discovered Videostrong backdoor in 1.3 million Android TV boxes that turned them into residential proxy botnet used by criminals.

Google’s Threat Intelligence Group says Videostrong Technology built and ran the XCPE backdoor in 1.3 million certified Android TV boxes. The backdoor has system-level privileges and sits in the firmware. If uninstalled it reinstalls from the /oem/ partition on reboot. Google took legal action to take down domains and servers. The takedown disrupted the botnet but the backdoor remains in infected boxes’ firmware.

Unconfirmed: Exact affected models not fully listed by Google

Key facts
  • - 1.3 million Android TV boxes affected
  • - Backdoor called x.cpe or com.oemservice
  • - Sold access to criminal affiliates
  • - Allows IP address rental for fraud
  • - Google banned Videostrong from certified devices
Security assessment · AI, from the articleExploited in the wild

Impact: Residential proxy network and ad fraud via 1.3 million TV boxes

What to do
  1. 1.Disconnect affected TV box
  2. 2.Contact seller or manufacturer for replacement
  3. 3.Isolate on separate network
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at malwarebytes.com

Videostrong planted a backdoor in more than 1. 3 million Android set-top boxes and sold criminals access to the resulting botnet.

Malwarebytes Labs

By @MetallicaMVP · malwarebytes.com

Read the full article at Malwarebytes Labs

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.