Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Seeing is Not Believing: Breaking the Physical-to-Digital Trust Boundary in Robotics

arXiv cs.CRby Leming Shen ()1 min read4 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers show a single ROS 2 environment variable lets attackers inject fake telemetry and hijack robots while spoofing downstream remote attestation.

A pre-built hook loaded via one modified environment variable covertly intercepts and injects both telemetry and control signals before publication in ROS 2, breaking the physical-to-digital trust boundary in multi-robot task handovers. Attackers can also distribute compromised third-party Docker containers and auxiliary tools embedding the hooks. On a physical Franka Emika arm running Secure ROS 2, the attack injects fabricated telemetry in real time with roughly 3 ms jitter and achieved an 87% success rate even against an AI-based detector. Findings were responsibly disclosed to the ROS 2 development team.

Key facts
  • Attack defeats remote attestation by spoofing sensor telemetry in real time
  • Supply-chain spread via compromised Docker packages with embedded hooks
  • Preserves temporal synchronization and hardware integrity during spoofing
  • Demonstrated physically on a Franka Emika robotic arm
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

In multi-robot collaboration, task handovers rely on downstream verifiers performing remote attestation, which inspects sensor telemetry to ensure a robot's physical behavior strictly matches its assigned task. But can this telemetry be trusted? We show that it often cannot.

arXiv cs.CR

By Leming Shen · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.