Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Redistribution score tracks recurring SAE feature shifts

Original title: Representation Redistribution in Sparse Autoencoders

Hugging Face daily papersby Ziye Mei, Haotian Ma ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

On two frozen safety readouts, median supports of about 20 features reached failure AUROCs of 0.935 and 0.958.

The paper studies how prompt transformations that preserve a request can redistribute activity across sparse autoencoder features. It introduces the redistribution sensitivity score to find large, consistently directed feature responses and checks them on held-out prompt variants. Across 27 pretrained SAEs and eight language models, the tested transformations produced a reproducible redistribution profile. An exact decomposition separates recurring representation change from signed readout contribution and decision failure.

Unconfirmed: AUROC figures are the authors' measurements on the two frozen safety readouts studied.

Key facts
  • Evaluation covered 27 pretrained SAEs spanning eight language models.
  • Median supports used 20 and 19 features on two frozen safety readouts.
  • Those supports gave recurrent failure AUROCs of 0.935 and 0.958.
  • Full erosion scored 0.965 and 0.964 on the same readouts.
  • Code is at the OpenSAE Redistribution-Sensitivity-Score repository.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose language model activations into sparse features, but prompt transformations designed to preserve the underlying request can redistribute activity across them. A feature change observed on one transformed prompt need not recur, and even a recurring change need not affect a downstream computation.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Ziye Mei, Haotian Ma · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.