Sparse autoencoders decompose Earth embeddings into sparse features
On AlphaEarth, trained SAEs leave eight times less variance unexplained than a frozen random decoder.
16 stories, newest first · one card per story
On AlphaEarth, trained SAEs leave eight times less variance unexplained than a frozen random decoder.
Sparse autoencoders recover named behavioral modes from embeddings and support zero-shot natural-language queries.
On SDXL-Turbo one-step generation, forgetting success rises 36.34 points over the best baseline.
Classifiers using only interpretable SAE features beat neural and stylometric detectors on out-of-distribution text.
On 16 synthetic settings recovery was near perfect; consistency rose 17.6% for dictionaries and 35.9% for coefficients.

Nick Cammarata argues famous polysemantic neurons were misread, claiming most Qwen3-32B neurons have one job.
On two frozen safety readouts, median supports of about 20 features reached failure AUROCs of 0.935 and 0.958.
SAE features are more compositional than random bases, but faithful explanations still need pairwise interactions.
SAE reconstruction converges on far less data, but one-to-one feature matches keep rising with more tokens.
On 12 tasks across six symbolic systems, SAE-IDF beats the same LLM's dense baseline by up to 45 points.
The method forgets hallucination-linked sparse features while retaining successful manipulation behavior in simulation and real robots.
Sparse autoencoder latents encode part-of-speech in distributed groups, not one-to-one grammatical features.
Proposes locally masked sparse-autoencoder anomaly detection that flags unsafe LLM outputs unsupervised, using only 1-2% of SAE neurons.
SAEScientist-Bench tests whether AI agents can autonomously run SAE interpretability research on Gemma-2-9B-IT; frontier agents trail expert baselines.
SAEScientist-Bench evaluates whether AI agents can autonomously conduct SAE interpretability research in Gemma-2-9B-IT, finding frontier agents trail expert baselines.
Researchers use sparse autoencoders to localize trigger-based backdoor mechanisms in 1B and 8B LLMs, finding detection features differ from causal control features.
Today 1.5K readers · 2.4K views · 754 reads · all time 189K views