Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

SpatialCORE: Confidence-Aware Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision--Language Models

Hugging Face daily papersby Rafi Ibn Sultan, Xiangyu Zhou, Md. Sajid Alam Chowdhury ()1 min read3 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

SpatialCORE uses grounding confidence as a reward so vision-language models reason from accurately localized objects.

SpatialCORE is a post-training method for large vision-language models that rewards bounding boxes which are both accurate and high-confidence. A self-regulating spatial reward weights box-matching quality by coordinate-token confidence, and an answer gate links grounding optimization to final-answer correctness. The authors report state-of-the-art results among open-source and specialized spatial-reasoning models, with zero-shot transfer to unseen distributions. Source code is released on GitHub.

Key facts
  • Rewards accurate, confident object grounding rather than final answers alone
  • Spatial reward weights box quality by coordinate-token confidence
  • An answer gate ties grounding updates to final-answer correctness
  • Reports SOTA among open spatial-reasoning models and zero-shot transfer
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have made remarkable progress across visual perception tasks, yet spatial reasoning remains a persistent weakness, especially for questions that require reasoning over visual space. Recent spatial-reasoning methods incorporate generated grounding, where models predict bounding boxes, masks, or other localization outputs for task-relevant objects as part of their reasoning trace.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Rafi Ibn Sultan, Xiangyu Zhou, Md. Sajid Alam Chowdhury · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.