Spatial Harness grounds VLM spatial reasoning in physics-engine states
On MindCube it raises Qwen3.5-27B from 52.70% to 71.14%, and to 98.25% when poses are annotated.
41 stories, newest first · one card per story
On MindCube it raises Qwen3.5-27B from 52.70% to 71.14%, and to 98.25% when poses are annotated.
Zoomed-region questions plus RLVR improved spatial, long-context, agent, and general visual reasoning without benchmark-specific data.
Reported circular accuracies are 97.9% on CV-Bench-3D, 90.8% on 3DCueBench, and 94.2% on DA-2K.
The benchmark has 316 scenes and 2,525 multi-turn pairs; GRPO increases view-seeking but lowers accuracy.
The authors say Ψ-0.6 beats leading open-weight models zero-shot on multi-view spatial reasoning and can simulate counterfactual scenes.
On five benchmarks it beats direct answers from the same backbone on four and ties on the fifth.
With Qwen3.8-27B it scores 66.5 on MMSI-Bench and 82.3 on ReVSI, above SpatialClaw.
About 100 scenes yield roughly 80K QA pairs used to train HOLIWORLD-VL-4B, evaluated on HOLIWORLD-Bench.
Claude Opus 5.5 scores 41.71% mean overlap; only 3.25% of targets exceed IoU 0.9.
Spatial-TRM raises RoboSpatial-Home context accuracy to 29.51% with 11.2M trainable parameters.
Grid-Bench tests whether LLMs can predict full grid states after sequences of spatial operations.
CoWorld Reasoner lets a VLM call a video world model as a tool, lifting accuracy on all seven reasoning benchmarks.
RoTA-Bench shows vision-language models struggle to recover target 3D projections through successive rotations.
CameraVLM, a 9B model, judges camera motion better than prior VLMs and matches humans.
A new benchmark finds vision-language models drop spatial relations from the representations used downstream.
SpatialASM trains vision-language models to plan viewpoints and imagine scenes, improving accuracy on seven spatial benchmarks.
Researchers identify S-Space, a linear subspace where multimodal models encode object coordinates.
SpatialASM trains vision-language models to plan viewpoints and simulate scenes for spatial reasoning.
SpaceCast-Bench tests predictive spatial reasoning; the best of 21 models scores 58.0% versus 87.2% for humans.
SpatialOPSD distills verified spatial coding-agent traces into a tool-free MLLM that beats SFT and GRPO.
SpaceCast-Bench finds VLMs weak at predictive spatial reasoning; the best model scores 58 percent versus 87.2 percent for humans.
GPD distills routed 3D geometry into an RGB-only VLM, lifting a 4B model to 57.1 on VSI-Bench.
SpatialCORE uses grounding confidence as a reward so vision-language models reason from accurately localized objects.
Soft Spatial Reasoning lets vision-language models mix token embeddings instead of committing to one spatial token.
Today 1.5K readers · 2.4K views · 754 reads · all time 189K views