Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Learning Foresight without Explicit Trajectories for 3D Diffusion Policies

Hugging Face daily papersby Zhongbo Zhang, Zaibin Zhang, Yifan Wang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Movement Trend Guidance adds latent foresight to 3D diffusion policies, improving DP3 across RoboTwin2.0, LIBERO-40, and real-robot tasks with only 3.52% more parameters.

The method learns a compact latent representation of interaction evolution from short observation histories, supervised by sparse future gripper states during training and retained as conditioning at inference. A gated FiLM branch applies the latent at the UNet bottleneck. It improves DP3 to 62.8% vs 56.1% on 50-task RoboTwin2.0 mixed training, 71.93% vs 37.08% on LIBERO-40, and 72.0% vs 49.0% on five real-robot tasks.

Key facts
  • Latent foresight conditioning avoids explicit trajectory planning
  • Only 3.52% parameter overhead over DP3
  • LIBERO-40 success jumps from 37.08% to 71.93%
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

3D diffusion policies are strong at generating geometrically grounded actions from current observations, but successful manipulation requires not only knowing what motion is feasible now, but also anticipating where the interaction is heading. Existing policies largely leave such foresight to emerge implicitly from action learning.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Zhongbo Zhang, Zaibin Zhang, Yifan Wang · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.