Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google API Flaw Let Weaker AI Models Decode Stronger Models' Reasoning

The Hacker Newsby @TheHackersNews ()4 min read2
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers show encrypted reasoning blocks in OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs can be replayed to recover hidden reasoning and secrets like API keys.

Researchers demonstrated that encrypted reasoning objects from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google reasoning APIs could be replayed across sessions, users, and models, letting weaker same-family models act as decoders of hidden reasoning. Across 6,708 public agent trajectories they decoded 315,320 thinking blocks and found 704 privacy artifacts from real user sessions, including 62 API keys, 33 passwords, 24 access tokens, and seven private keys. The replayable blocks also enabled invisible prompt-injection proof-of-concepts; the main extraction attack is no longer reproducible as of August 2026 following mitigations, though no vendor has publicly acknowledged the flaw.

Key facts
  • Researchers decoded 315,320 thinking blocks across 6,708 public agent trajectories
  • Found 704 privacy artifacts: 62 API keys, 33 passwords, 24 access tokens, seven private keys
  • Weaker same-family models served as decoders: Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.6 Luna, Gemini Robotics ER-1.6
  • Replayable opaque reasoning blocks enabled invisible prompt-injection proof of concept
  • Main extraction attack no longer reproducible as of August 2026 after vendor mitigations
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

4 min read at thehackernews.com

A newly disclosed flaw in the way OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google carried hidden AI reasoning between API calls let researchers recover internal reasoning and secrets from session logs, including API keys and passwords.

The Hacker News

By @TheHackersNews · thehackernews.com

Read the full article at The Hacker News

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.