Foreign Affairs essay frames US-China AI race as constrained
First merged summary.
A Foreign Affairs essay says US and Chinese AI power is concentrated but constrained by debt, chips, minerals and Taiwan risk.
Historian Niall Ferguson, researcher Lisa Klaassen and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt argue in Foreign Affairs that advanced AI access is concentrating in the United States and China. They compare OpenAI and Anthropic to East India Companies because the labs deal with governments while remaining under state control, citing a June Commerce Department order that led Anthropic to shut Fable 5 and Mythos 5 worldwide. The essay says Washington trades closed models for alignment while Beijing spreads open-weight models, with mirrored bottlenecks in chips, minerals and power. It cites more than $600 billion in planned 2026 US tech AI investment, mostly debt, and a Bloomberg-reported Chinese draft of $295 billion over five years. The authors propose an AI détente, including caps on cyberattack and biodesign model capabilities.
- Essay compares OpenAI and Anthropic to colonial trading companies under state control.
- June Commerce order led Anthropic to shut Fable 5 and Mythos 5 worldwide.
- Fable 5 export controls were lifted after about two weeks.
- Mythos 5 remained limited to some US organizations.
- Essay cites over $600 billion in 2026 US tech AI investment, mostly debt.
- Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta plan roughly $725 billion in AI investment this year.
What each outlet adds
beyond the shared facts- The DecoderDetails the Foreign Affairs essay, investment figures, model limits and proposed détente.
- Countries
- United StatesChinaTaiwan
Coverage
oldest first · one row per article · UTCAltman says advanced AI will escape sandboxes and require alignment
He also claims models already find hardware flaws, while the FTC is investigating agent incidents at OpenAI and Anthropic.
Schmidt essay likens OpenAI and Anthropic to colonial trading companies
A Foreign Affairs essay argues debt, minerals, chips and a Taiwan risk constrain the US-China AI race.