LoRA dynamics differ between supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning
RL concentrates LoRA spectrum while SFT expands it at moderate rates, with group-mean baseline subtraction identified as the source.
13 stories, newest first · one card per story
RL concentrates LoRA spectrum while SFT expands it at moderate rates, with group-mean baseline subtraction identified as the source.
A single likelihood trainer mixes static data and RL generations and is reported to improve the accuracy-compute tradeoff.
The authors recast RL stages as maximum-likelihood fits to model-generated targets and mix them in one trainer.
Claude Code with Opus-5 raised equal-weighted generalization scores 9.2% relative, or 2.3 absolute points, over the starting models.
With a fixed Qwen3.5-27B backbone, Forced mode reached 88.08% overall, 10.90 points above the strongest baseline.
Across five Qwen3 scales it lifts the equal-weight Tau1, Tau2 and BFCL mean by 16.9 to 29.8 points.
A 4B PatEx-Agent trained on synthetic trajectories is presented as competitive with much larger general-purpose agents.
On ten held-out personas, fine-tuning and reinforcement learning improved personality, style, and music responses.
SFT on Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct raised the Claw-Eval mean from 46.6 to 64.1, including a 31.9-point multi-turn gain.
Architect-Ant learns professional furnishing from 505 real floor plans and generates editable furniture layouts.
Paper shows constraining SFT parameter updates to on-policy update directions (OPSFT) transfers on-policy generalization gains to supervised fine-tuning.
ActObs supervises observation tokens during SFT, improving GRPO-trained agent pass@k on Terminal-Bench 2.0 and cross-domain code editing for Qwen3 models.
Controlled mid-training experiments on Qwen3-8B-Base find each domain has a 10-40% coverage optimum and domain gaps survive alignment SFT.
Today 1.5K readers · 2.4K views · 754 reads · all time 189K views