EVAThink trains video models to reason when frame evidence is sparse
Using 6.7K curated samples, it improves the base model under both 32- and 64-frame budgets.
47 stories, newest first · one card per story
Using 6.7K curated samples, it improves the base model under both 32- and 64-frame budgets.
On MindCube it raises Qwen3.5-27B from 52.70% to 71.14%, and to 98.25% when poses are annotated.
EviSeek makes evidence demands explicit to boost accuracy on 3,436 ESI-Bench questions.
GUILD alternates vision-language model task proposals with predictive data attribution evaluation to close the collection loop.
4-bit quantization retains 98.6% answer quality while reducing memory by 49%, running in 0.12s for first token on edge devices.
Benchmark shows top vision-language models achieve only 50.38% accuracy on integrated physical tasks.
The framework builds a task rubric, then runs GUI or code checks and rejects unsupported completion claims.
Best vision-language models achieve only 7.2% on per-color counting in BedBench compared to humans at 93.3%.
Experts preferred parallel listwise judging over sequential refinement in 78.5% of decided comparisons.
The benchmark has 4.1K evaluation and 85K training samples; timing and answer quality rose 10.7% over baselines.
On Qwen3-VL-4B, early vision-layer steering moved unsafe rejection between 6% and 96% without retraining.
The best of 22 models scores 58.5% on 1,000 examples drawn from 23 datasets across five agent domains.
The benchmark uses 15 datasets, four imaging modalities, and 1,537 problems covering 9,041 cell-linking decisions.
A unified metric finds compact grounding VLMs can fail with confident wrong boxes, not only missed people.
Across 19 models and 558,334 evaluations, 4,342 queries were answered by a smaller model and missed by a larger one.
Average accuracy reached 53.2% on six 3D benchmarks, 22.0 points above base Qwen and above Gemini 3.6 Flash.
RoTA-Bench shows vision-language models struggle to recover target 3D projections through successive rotations.
Across 25 vision-language models, game and real scores correlate at 0.935; constraint reasoning rose in one-shot transfer.
SIMIT generates query-specific practice examples at test-time yielding +7.20% mean gain over BAGEL-7B.
A new benchmark finds vision-language models drop spatial relations from the representations used downstream.
Researchers propose PAGE, an AI framework that parses and annotates thousands of American comics and Japanese manga.
SpatialASM trains vision-language models to plan viewpoints and imagine scenes, improving accuracy on seven spatial benchmarks.
Across 26 models, documentation is strong for in-frame text but weak for measurements and small spatial relations.
MOTIVE uses multi-view self-verification so vision-language models accept reliable answers and rethink uncertain ones.
Today 1.5K readers · 2.4K views · 754 reads · all time 189K views